We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
You have a point Jhon ! But not all cases women try to abuse the system some but not all.
So the guy might be dyslexic his point is why can’t the person work? Why dose she want to claim CSA from the grandparents? That’s barmy …. If I was in her shoes I would fight for a good job and future. Women that use the CSA for a free dinner ticket to get one over on the ex is selfish and create conflicts. Yes the absent party should pay if it’s there responsibility but enough with the games …
My ex husband has just sold the former matrimonial home for dam near £250,000 rumour has it shacked up with his neighbour but refuses to tell me where he and my children are living. I Have no contact details for any of them I still pay 240 a month. Believe me when I say he is in a much better position than I am. It’s not all women that are greedy twats on here….men are just as bad when they want to be especially when they have an evil and vindictive mother to guide them.
You just phone up the CSA and they’ll take your claim and send you out some forms. They get in touch with your childs father and start going through his finances then decide what he’s due to pay you. You won’t get a penny from the grandparents as it’s not their child and they’re not legally responsible to pay for him/her !
I’m female and the women seen to be after money I agree dads have a responsibility to a child however it does seem it is for the mother to maintain her lifestyle!! I think Csa should check where the money goes and of the child doesn’t get it then Csa put in a fund until the child is 18 instead of taking the mothers word as gospel!! I know people who spend it on nails hair clothes or even worse drugs cigs and alcohol!! I think some and I mean some have the right to vent especially when they have to come out of work as the mothers have ruined through revenge rather than what’s best for the child it’s even worse when they won’t allow the child to see their dad as its part game playing!
Surely that’s against the law if your paying maintenance for your kids xx
Someone i know has been overcharged thousands and the leeches still ain’t repaid.
Remember, dads make better parents when they have custody.
It needs to be means tested at both ends. We lost our house and had to live separately because of how much we had to pay to my partners ex. Do you know what she used the money for? To pay for a loan for her boob job!! We haven’t seen my step son for nearly 2years now because we refused to buy him school shoes from Clarks!
@ Cheryl smith
Why don’t you ever reply to my post…you are sooo full of shit and likes of you will never understand why the likes of me and others on here rant on about this fucking biased towards the mother shite unfair system.
NONE of us resent paying their way with the kids, it’s the way it’s taken and how much, not giving a fuck for the Nrp and how he survives with a new family and kids to support. It’s seems the ex can milk him dry whilst she is living the life of old Reilly with a wealthy partner or the good old tax payer. You think it’s fair that the csa robs a ex’s new partner of her child tax credits to pay his ex’s kids. How that fair. No wonder so many men try avoiding the csa like the plague, they are robbing bastards. And why is the money given to to ex and not as vouchers so you can ensure its spent on the kids and not on the ex. And NO, my money should not be used for helping pay the ex’ electric and gas bill. No fucking way, the ex would still have to pay that whether my kid lived with her or not, so why should the nrp’s money subsidise her bills.
Wind your fucking neck in Man hater
Bring it on, I’m ready for your shit.
Gonk
No there’s not more to the story. I had the kids 50/50 on paper and more in practice. I provided more than her in terms of what the kids needed and joint bills like sons guitar lessons etc were shared. CSA still said I had to pay her hundreds a month. She had no bills that I didn’t.
Matt O’Saurus
Im in your gang mate…this bitch Cheryl Smith will never understand mate…shes a man hater and as far as this bitch is concerned you had a kid and shit happened that may not have been your doing, but you are are not allowed to move on in her eyes and the csa’s eyes. You have no life after the ex. She lives live through rose tinted specs.
I despise this woman and wish she would answer my post, reply ! let me educate you. You cannot justify a system that treats real dads that want to care for their kids but CANT because of the csa and the likes of you
Gonk
Why should good loving fathers pay if they don’t have contact with their children because if narcissistic sociopathic vindictive ex’s ?
Answer: They shouldn’t (and avoid at all opportunity).
When family courts start to impose sanctions (freezing benefits/maintenance) on these mothers that blatantly alienate children from fathers then the ‘system’ will start to work for BOTH concerned parties, until then fathers will continue to be treated like crap.
Just for Cheryl Smith
Why should good loving fathers pay if they don’t have contact with their children because if narcissistic sociopathic vindictive ex’s ?
Answer: They shouldn’t (and avoid at all opportunity).
When family courts start to impose sanctions (freezing benefits/maintenance) on these mothers that blatantly alienate children from fathers then the ‘system’ will start to work for BOTH concerned parties, until then fathers will continue to be treated like crap and justifiably speak out.
So Cheryl Smith…take a walk and spout your biased bs to some twonk that will listen !