CSA payment finally after ten years
After nearly Ten years of countless letters and follow-up phone calls from me to The CSA in pursuit of a laughingly ridiculous ammount of £5 per week to be deducted from the work-shy, benefit-frauding layabout of an Ex’s State unemployment handout, I had all but given up.
Can you now imagine my complete shock and total amazement when out of the blue,a cheque for £10 dropped through my letterbox, indicating that FINALLY, someone at the CSA had managed to put two and two together, read the blatantly obvious benefit information held about the Ex for almost a Decade, and ACT on it!
I have always worked to support our Son and shall continue to do so as it is, in my opinion,the right and proper thing to do. I was raised in the belief that if you decide to have children, you move heaven and earth to PROVIDE FINANCIALLY for those children.
I am under no illusion whatsoever that any future payments will appear as i’m convinced the cheque was a “freak” administrative blunder, but after so many years of getting fobbed off with empty promises from the CSA, i am taking comfort in the fact that although £5 a week barely even covers a couple of meals for my son, it’s £5 that the Ex won’t have to spend on his Cigarettes and Beer!
So, I will finish with a hearty “thanks for nothing” to the CSA and all those supposedly working in our interests to bring the responsibility-sherking parasites to financial justice. It’s just too little too late i’m afraid……
Coincidently, i have framed the insult of a cheque and hung it on the back of my toilet door – it seemed the most apt location for it – always guarenteed an emergency sheet of loo roll should i ever run right out!
233 thoughts on “CSA payment finally after ten years”
Leave a Reply
I have always thought that for £5 pw in CM it really isn’t worth the agrovasion of the CSA. Just forget it and move on with your life.
Well done.
Lol. OMG! 10 pounds? That's crap money! Never mind, the children are not silly and they will know who really loved them and who provided for them, be it in cash, or in another way such as buying clothes for them ,food etc.
I like what you've done with the cheque
£5 just isnt enuff for the retail therapy then…lol
£5 is a bag of chips – just about. Earn my own Retail Therapy money thank you as i work for a living.All i have ever hoped for is to be treated fairly.Nothing More…….
Both NRP and PWC are entitled to be treated fairly!!!!!! bag opf chips, oh what a healthy meal that is or is that due to laziness…..??????£5 is part payment to a pair a decent pair of childs shoes from wyndsors!!!!! Bag o chips?????food is a natural household commodity…. childs footwear and clothing isnt, why isnt that money put to the childs needs????Framed for your glory or as a reserved banking emergency for childs needs???? Clearly if you didnt intend cashing it then you really didnt need it!!!! or was it to get ya point over and glorify your greed and get 1 over on ya NRP???The evidence speaks for itself and the public will decide!!!!!
Bag o chips is a treat or a luxury, you could get half a sack o spuds for £2.50… bottle of oil £2.00….. You could have chips every night of the week served on a plate, and if prefer paper, buy a news paper with the left over 50p……that paper should last a week!!!!Bag o chips indeed, Damn !!! you do make me laugh!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey Allan,
This is an example of; the other side of the coin…
Plenty of NRP’s let off steam regarding ‘money grabbing’ P’sWC and the CSA, so why shouldn’t a PWC let off steam about a NRP and the CSA in these circumstances?
FYI, the agency does work for some people, but it also lets others down ~ doesn’t matter whether their PWC or NRP, the system has failed them. The main party wronged is the children involved.
chall ~ afairercsaforall
allan,stop being so bloody horrible.whether u think chips isnt nutritious enough doesnt matter.its food in her kids belly at end of day.
exactly and the choice to stick it in frame on bathroom door benefits the child how???????
Evidently… too much of an emotional reaction without the application of reasonable Logic!!!!!!!!!!!!
helen.. a bag o chips at the chippy that lasts one meal… or a sack of chips from the veg shop, farm shop, Apple cart etc… where sacks are cheaper than superstore bags of spuds… you have greater quantity and should last anywhere between 1 week to a fortnight!!!!I think the latter would provide more food in the childs belly than 1 chippy meal, wouldnt you agree??????
Now you see why I laugh!!! I aint being horrible… I'm presenting a logical argument in reference to 1 bag o chips at the cost of £5… however! the cheque referred to is to the sum of £10… maybe you helen might have a better informed use on the redundant use of such a cheque!!!!!! Lets hear it!!!!!!
The state determines 'dole' money to be the minimum amount one NEEDS to legaly live on. So to take £5 a week from this is Illegal. Clearly demonstrates that CSA is whip to beat the father with and nothing to do with child support. Well done mummy, we're so proud of you for forcing daddy to live below the legal poverty line.Yet another obvious provocative post from a CSA parasite. Ho Ho Ho aint you funny.
The truth is, that as a handout dependant, I actually cost the state a lot less than the tax parasites that work for the CSA.
Allan Morrell exactly and the choice to stick it in frame on bathroom door benefits the child how???????Drives home to the child that the father thinks they are worrthless. The action of a responsible caring mother !!!
The shallow consumer knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
had I been the recipient of the £10 cheque… if budgeting for food by use of that cheque… I would not frame it,… I would cash it…. go to the farm shop… 2doz extra large eggs.. £3, Full Sack o spuds £4.50.. £7.50.. so far!!!!!! £2.50… approximately 8 tins o beans… thats 1 week to 2 weeks dependoing on size of family… eggs, chips and beans, however!!!! surely ther would be stocked in food cupboards a tin o crned beef.. CORNED BEEF HASH….. Beef and veg to make a stew….. scrambled eggs with toast or egg butties…. and some illogical twit of a PWC whinges about … It's just enuff to pay for a bag o chips!!! RIDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!
Also Helen… Note: the intention the PWC of having it framed rather than making a provision of food for child!!!! So the child is fed by the uncashed framed cheque??????I do believe that argument of yours has been discredited!!!!!!
allan,dont think lisa ment chips from a chippie.i can understand her frustrations.1o pound in ten years wow 1 pound a year eh.as she states she works 4 a liven 2 help support her children.kids hav 2 parents who shud be providing.uv probably done silly things when uv been angry,framin it is wot she did.how is she so greedy then
csa have let this family down badly.shame on them.it wud av benefitted them more if it wos regular money every week.not once in ten years.
Helen…well thats clearly an issue the PWC needs to take up with CSA but I choose when in anger again to apply reason not stupidity!!!! but that's me!!!! I have stated what I would do and I do believe that my idea would sufficiently make provision for the child, however a bag o chips from Iceland, or Asda would not go as far as the purchases I described previously.. I choose to apply reason and logic rather than react emotionally!!!! I choose not to be as stupid as the original poster appears to be by such actions which evidently are not supportive to the child financially or emotionally as framing the cheque is not exactly conducively financing the child of any sort of provisions!!!!!!!!How would you describe the actions of the original poster… eh helen?????
As for Lisa's comment…. well my comments clearly outweigh her £5 for a bag o chips!!!!!
The greed issue is removing the financial input to the child which the NRP provided!!!! end of!!!! to support the PWC's ha ha at the NRP!!! and at the cost of the child as the child is not benefiting from an uncashed cheque payment which the NRP is now without… the greed also is an issue of PWC gloating!!!!!!!
her actions r from utter disgust nd frustration allan,i can understand why she did.im sure lisa knows exactly how much food she can buy with it.nd about the gloatin bit,im sure the nrp cud well be gloatin 2 people about only payin 10 pounds in ten years.this woman has provided 4 her children on her own all these years.as i said she wudnt be so upset if the father wos payin more regular nd if csa had actually done there jobs properly.
what about the situation where the NRP has contact then??? pay per view is it..????.. or NRP trying to live on benefits and maybe finding it hard to gain employment???. Do we actually know why the NRP is on benefits??? Can he afford to live???Clearly there is an issue of support for PWC but do we know if her intentions are conducive to the childs needs???? Surely the childs needs are more important than the PWC's needs!!????????
What should be paramount is, the system fails some. Never mind if they are NRP's, PWC etc ~ There's good and bad on both sides of the fence.
I see onlythat you make supportive excuses for the actions of the PWC…. But there is no excuse that you can make that would be considered reasonable for the actions of the PWC original poster by not using the NRP's donation to support the childs needs, and to frame it is disgusting in itself.. the actions of this PWC appear to be about the emotional needsof the PWC rather than the financial and emotional needs for the child!!!!Frustrations shouldnt even come near it!!!!!
Helen, you only assume the NRP is gloating, but the PWC's gloating is on this page for all to see in black and white and therefore clearly presenting her gloating about the NRP being £5 less and although we are led to believe that the NRP is using the monies for cigs and alcohol!!! do you truly believe she the PWC has any right to tell the NRP how to use his finances????????
I agree this mess is an abysmal failure to EVERYONE that is forced to deal with it. PWC, NRP and especially CHILDREN are all being abused by this mess !
what is actually important is the childs needs however financed!!! not the emotional gloatings against NRP because the CSA did not pursue the case properly for the sake of the child!!!!It's abhorrant for any PWC to gloat over the downfall of the NRP…. what would the child make of this if they are to know the truth??? the gloating of the fathers downfall…. the child deserves better than this!!!!!
Tell me helen, I'm an NRP who is not paying child maintenance, does that make me an irresponsible Father????
I see Lisa responds as if she were to be the original poster!!!! I accept the possibility upon review of the argument in the above comments… however! that £10 cheques is for the childs needs, not to be gloatingly framed for personal gratification of selfish arrogance!!!!
no parent has the rite 2 tell the other how 2 spend there money allan.that also applys 2 nrp,s.lisa has made sure her childs needs have been met,its wrong 2 presume otherwise.nd allan iv read loads of comments from nrp,s gloatin about downfall of pwc,so how wud child feel bout that.it works both ways,does it not..as 4 u not payin any maintenance,u send them vouchers when u can.so whether i think ur irresponsible doesnt matter,uv obviously got a clear conscience.helpin with childs needs is not always just about money its all the other things 2.
you are right about its not just money! As for sending vouchers, that's about children I do not see, have shared care of my eldest and provide and have provided financially by PAYE DEO's until August 2008..the case of gloatings can go either way but is not in the interests of the child and both PWC and NRP need to see this and more so between themselves rather than people who are not ex's…I in no way recall telling anyone how to spend the maintenance but I do recall stating how I would use the maintenance as a PWC!!!!! I did not presume the childs needs were not being met by the PWC, I did only comment in relation to an uncashed cheque that has been provided for the childs needs and has not been put to use for the childs needs but for the entertainment of the PWC's arrogance regarding the NRP's donations (or lack of such, for that matter!!!!) I did not state that the payment was used for retail therapy… I consider from the evidence that the provision has only been removed from the NRP's finances plus the childs additional needs and has not been put to use….. this clearly describes the PWC's vengeance being appeased by the causing of hardship to NRP's financial status….. whether she uses the NRP donations or not, it still causes hardship to NRP… A gloat over the downfall of the NRP…. Are you attempting to tell me that tit for tat is reasonable and also in the best interests of the child's welfare needs????Are you happy to defend a PWC who is denying the child of the financial provision made by cheque to the sum of £5.. by the NRP.????.. CSA didnt provide it, NRP provided it by CSA deductions..!!!!I know if I were to be the PWC that I would not request the help of CSA… I wouldnt even ask the NRP for financial help… I for the best interests of the child would prefer to allow the NRP to take the child shopping and with shared care make such provisions emotionally and financially!!!!!
I meant sum of £10 with provision of £5 per week sorry!
I clearly present my dissapproval of how the child has not benefited from the NRP's donations!!!!
at the end of day,it,s up 2 her wot she does with the cheque.on the subject of nrp bein able 2 just take kids shoppin.wot if they refuse 2 spend money on things like,clothes.decent shoes nd then sys thats mothers job not mine.wot then.wot wud u think the pwc shud do.
Fuck me…thats just insulting!!! £1 a year for 10 years…are you bloody joking???? I would've photocopied it and posted on every lampost where the bastard lived…THEN put it on my toilet door. NRP benefit parasite = poor & hard done by . PWC raising kids on benefits = benefit parasite + kids. I'm done with this fucking website and the masogonistic, bitter, vengeful parents on it.
Well Lisa girl you started something here!
Mr Alan Morality oh sorry morrell seems to be fixated with ‘chips’
Somebody made the comment about you being greedy and putting the NRP below the poverty line.mmmmmmmmmmmm he does this himself by not getting of his backside and working. This site is supposed to be here for the good of NRP and PWCS alike but the Lynch mob have taken over and would have every PWC burnt at the stake,’ well after you lynch mob don’t burn your tootsies!’
It's very unfortunate that there has to be veangfull parents involved.. if only NRP and PWC could compromise for the sake of the children.Too many times that vengeance has to appear in the equation!!!An NRP who is not prepared to provide isnt being a parent, but those who put any effort in towards any of their children is!!!But there is no evidence in this post suggesting the NRP involved was unwilling to make provisions by taking child shopping, there is no evidence the child and NRP have contact either, such comments are clearly based on prejudice against NRP's by experience of PWC.I certainly havent been judgemental, I comment based on the evidence on my screen… as to child maintenance has not been applied to provisions for the child… rather than comment of satisfaction to the PWC ego!!!!Clearly the PWC ego is existent….. how about satisfying the needs of the child??? Aint this what Child maintenance is all about..We are all familiar with the comment… "Thats what is says on my screen " aint we?????!!!!!!!It seems odd and very illogical to otherwise fight for something you had no need to use!!! It's a shame that the child isnt benefitting from the cheque being framed and on the loo door…. strange place to hang it, but hey… I prefer to apply logic rather than be so emotionally influenced by a cheque…. How much did the frame cost???? …see what I mean about the ego bit eh……..lolIt's all on your screen…….!!!!!!!
Is no one familiar with the phrase, Be greatfull for small mercies or be greatfull for what you have…???????I still think at least the child has some pocket money by provision of the cheque… let the child benefit instead of the PWC ego benefitting!!!!!.put the cheque into an account for the child even… LET THE CHILD BENEFIT… stop the satisfaction of PWC ego… framing the cheque???Absolutely RIDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!
no need 2 use allan.4 10 years shes needed it,but probably got fed up of waitin on the csa 2 actually do somethin.
What the hell does it matter what the frame cost.it’s her money.bloody hell the measley £10 belongs to her, she’s paid for this child for all the years her useless ex has’nt put his hand in his benefit filled pocket.
Allan it’s got nothing to do with you what this pwc does with the cheque.
then surely the privelage 2 the child in pocket money would be bonus???
Sorry for the delay in replying – i have been at work – earning money to raise my Son."Allan" – i will treat your comments with the contempt they deserve.I have NEVER stopped the parasite seeing his Son.I have PAID OUT OF MY WAGES to allow the parasite to take his Son out.I have taken the most awful and humiliating verbal and physical abuse WITNESSED SEVERAL TIMES by my Son.I have had to mop up my lovely Sons tears TIME AFTER TIME AFTER TIME when the alcoholic piece of vermin has let him down…. again and again and again……..I have just had to witness yet another Christmas when he rings to say – "i'll make it up Son – i promise,but i just ain't got any money for presents"…..
……… Not even a card for the Lad – YET AGAIN.He took my Son out and STOLE my Mothers Day Card this year – my son was horrified."Allan" – you know nothing of what i have had to endure,nothing about the good and kind law abiding citizen i am either.The "bag of chips for a fiver" comment is called "Wit".I am fully aware of the value of nutrition – i am a nurse.Crawl back under your stone,Allan – i am sure you will find the scumbag of an Ex of mine there to – i would suggest that you watch your wallet though……….
Lisa, your wit is quite humerous! As for your parasite of an ex, well clearly you never divulged the information until now, However! the issue is as I previously comment, maybe that the cheque should be cashed for your child in recompense for your childs fathers behaviour!! A guide in direction which I present which is a logical assessment of your situation, not a critisism unless constructive critisism!!! In no way do I present comment negatively!!!I dont judge you or critisize you but surely the cheque should benefit your child without the need to inflate your own ego by framing it!!!Yeah, you're having the last laugh… I think your child deserves to have the last laugh…As for your childish overinflated ego which is evident by your instruction for myself to crawl under my stone…. I must make you aware that my ego is of greater inflation than your own and I make no denial of that!!! I note a lot of your comments is all about you… your commenting of I am a good this that and the other is evidence of your ME me ME attitude!!!!! what I'v had to put up with, you make it sound like raising your child by yourself demeaning when considering raising a child by yaself is actually something to be commended for!!!I would allow the child to be reccompensed by any amount, menial or otherwise that is recovered in maintenace for the tears that your child has shed!!!And for the final comment of watching my wallet… Errrr! I do not see what my wallet has to do with anything, specifically in connection with your scumbag of an ex!!!! So I fail to understand what you are getting at in telling me to watch my wallet!!! A meaningless emotional egotistical outburst I suspect!!! As for crawling back under my stone, may I ask which stone you refer too and how and why exactly would I be likely to find your ex there???Are you attempting to tell me that I'm in the same league as your ex??? or is that my paranoid dellusional self informing me that was your measly attempt to insult this thick skinned empty skull of mine????Now that's wit!!!!!!
By the way Lisa… I am even looking into voluntary work… which would mean I would still be on benefits but still work sweety!!! I am constantly reviewing and editing many of my photographs for image library stock in the slow attempt to create my own business… still I am working while not profiing but work never the less, with the sole intention of running my own business… Maybe I should crawl back under my lazy benefit scrounging stone again eh!!!!!??????Again more wit|||||||… lets see your latest quick witted comeback sweetheart!!!!!
~ its such a shame that some of the posts here appear antagonistic. Come on guy's, this has got out of hand AND the failings of the CSA sidelined.If we want change, we need to be together, neither side will mange it on their own!!