Categories
CSA Complaints

Would it be the same the other way around?

I think CSA ought to be re-named as MSA, Mum Support Agency!

What if the father took the kids away from their mum, would the mother have to pay maintenance?

Would the father be able to claim all the benefits instead?

I think these women, the CSA and the government ought to be tarred with the same brush!!!

7 thoughts on “Would it be the same the other way around?

  1. Of cause you have just reinforced what most of know. I am not against providing for my child and the basic idea about an agency being set up to chase absent fathers sounded like a good idea,after all why should any biological father or mother run away from their responcibiliy to help support their kids should the parents part.
    But we all know that the agency is corrupt and unfair and biased towards the pwc and 9 times out of 10 ,that’s the mother.
    It’s an agency that just bleeds the ex for cash to replace the treasury purse after it gives out so much money to lazy scrounging single parents and layabouts that see having kids as a way of getting a free ride in life and masses of benefits inc free housing, council tax paid for …the list is endless what these people get, and it’s made even easier with the CSA being totally on their side.
    You are so right about the boot being on the other foot. I bet if I got my daughter back from her mother who screws me for £320 each month to top up her income and her working partner, I could almost guarantee that I would get fuck all from her or the state…because I work for living…it’s a fucking joke.
    Gonk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *