We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
No they are not taken into consideration, which is a good thing. She didn’t create the child with you.
no his wifes money is nothing to do with csa
No it’s nt ur exs partners kid
Nooooo. Y do you want to fook her life up for. Work if you want money….
Greedy cow
Typical Mindset, what more can you say!!!!!
Not sure this is necessary, she only asked a question, as for if you want money, get a job, it’s not always that easy when you have kids.
this post was nothing to do with me, why has it been sent in my name
these comments were made in my name but definetly not sent by me, annoying !
for one my husband doesnt even give me any maintenance, so count yourself lucky.
UN REAL isn’t it..let’s wait until she tells us she had another child, her marriage failed an she is now looking to sucker TWO men for more money!! GREEDY F**K
Tax credits of the pwc is nothing to do with maintenance that an nrp pays….why would it be? Not your ex’s fault you lost your tax credits through your husband working!
No, your ex’s new wife income isn’t taken in to consideration just like your husbands income isn’t and rightly so….the child is yours and your ex responsibility only….really quite cheeky to ask, good on his new wife for working hard and if your child has a relationship with his dad I’m sure she’ll be helping provide in some way.
No thankfully not. I mean why should she or your ex for that matter be penalized for her having a hogh paid job. As for yourself your new husband must also be highly paid if you have list all your tax credits
I think its different if it was started 2003 but not afterwards. She obviously has more than enough to live on if their combined wages are past the threshold but I suppose her argument is that her new husband is considered as making a financial contribution to the upbringing of children that are not his either therefore she is asking if it works both ways !
no , when u got marred ur oh by law has to help along sid e u n their dad , his wife on the over hand DOSE NOT the kids live with u so down to u , ur ho n their dad . u would not like to pay for someone us kids so y should she
At Christina, which was her husbands choice plus if it’s now his home of course he would contribute to the family unit but his income is not included in the workout of maintenance payments or reduced to reflect such, what the nrp pays will top up any income within that home…but pre 2003 all pwcs and nrps circumstances were looked at so if she is on old rules has she also notified csa of that change which could also reflect greatly on payments.
No new partner should have their income included to work out child maintenance which has essentially nothing to do with them….and I tnink on old rules a new partner can withhold this information.
It’s a shame that as my husband’s partner, I actually do have to pay for my husband’s child from a previous relationship, as CSA give his ex 15.2% of MY child tax credits that I recieve for MY children. LIVID is an understatement.
No your ex,s new partners wages wont be taken into account and why should they? Did she give birth to your children? Nope so its between you and your ex,s however many you may have!