We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
The child support agency isn’t there to support children with money or access to both parents. It is a government back debt collection agency that takes money, illegally in my instances.
Ben hates paying for his kids!
Fuck off Alex, I pay £500 a month for my son and have done since the day he was born 9 years ago. Don’t pretend to know anything about me.
The csa owe me £5200 through over payments so don’t presume I’m a payment dodger, I’m owed. You clearly haven’t had to deal with the csa bullshit before.
Ben you are so right. There isn’t a beating heart at that agency. There’s a big dirty greedy bastard money making debt recovery family destroying cunt engine at the heart of it.
Because you have a legal obligation to and should have a moral one too. He will think even less of you when he finds out U never contributed to anything for him. And if that’s what you feel I do t blame her for not letting you see him!
Claire, you sound like one of those greedy mum’s who doesn’t give a toss about how the father feels as long as you get your money (over inflated probably). What experience have you actually had with the csa? You need to get your facts right before you start having a go at the guys on here! Ben why are you paying £500 a month for one child? It seems excessive.
You don’t pay to see your child you pay because he is your child. Now what the mother is doing is absolutely wrong as she shouldn’t act this way but what should matter is your son wellness regardless of you seeing him or not and the stories between you and his mum.
Fuck off Alex you bell end!!
Alex/Claire
you 2 obviously condom mothers and this parasite agency bleeding dads for cash and not caring whether the kids see their dads or not..its all about money money money. the nrp is just a ATM machine and his kids are cash cows to the mother.
so fuck off Alex and Claire you clueless twats
Gonk
It is cases like this that are really hurting families because in this case Mum wants financial support and Dad wants to be involved with his child’s upbringing. Both are justified in their demands.
Unfortunately, the CSA do not care about the rights (or the lack of rights) of the NRP. When the CSA was set up to support the PWC, the law should have changed to insist upon the presumption of reasonable shared care. The set up and rules surrounding child support simply incentivise the PWC to reduce the time the NRP spends with the child.
We should not be in a situation where one parent, who has the full backing of a government agency can unilaterally decide how much time the other parent spends with their child.