We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
No, if you’re the paying parent, the onus is ALWAYS on you to counter their lies, even if the evidence that they are wrong is in THEIR files, it’s on you to find it and point it out to them.
Had a very similar situation myself. Automatically I was the lier and she was the truth teller
The onus is on you to prove this, even if the PWC gets caught lying they will make no changes to their case files if in the future similar happens. As the NRP you are guilty until proven innocent.
I thought csa only acted from the date of the claim or nearest to week start or end, i cant get with a claim being inplace…. Surely you drew monies from a bank or cash machine at a regular interval and a regular sum to collaborate what you say, would be intrested to know the final outcome with the csa, after reading some of the stories it seems as though rather than ease a maintenance agreement the csa are making parents loath each orher which cannot be healthy for any child to observe, all i have read is men hating their ex and visa versa – surely the emotions should be aimed at the government who engaged an agency who funny enough fail both pwc and nrp – that would be a show of unity and strength to answer too!