Whats the problem with taking money directly from his wages?

15 thoughts on “Whats the problem with taking money directly from his wages?”

1. Oh dear maybe your ex isn’t allowed to move on, you might have brought your kids up alone so you say, why has the father never had/wanted access, after divorce unfortunate this happens, maybe your kids having a relationship with their father is more important than screwing him through this abhorrent place

2. @CSAHell onesided claptrap grrrrrrrrr

3. RT @CSAHell: Whats the problem with taking money directly from his wages?: Csa what a joke I have been divorced for 1… http://t.co/crCqPX…

4. Where does he work exactly? Hes non-compliant obviosly, the system can be beaten if hes smart enough, you need to give more information if you want actual advice.

5. Get a job

6. @lisa, her ex should still contribute something. I do, and every working nrp should. just not what the CSA say, thats too much

7. @ Derek I agree, each child deserves support but like abroad it’s one small set amount per child regardless of income, because the CSA take so much and cripple working dads can’t blame them for leaving work to support themselves and there families, usually the pwc doesn’t work gets all the benefits and CSA and has so much money coming in where as the nrp can’t afford to eat, I don’t think that’s fair

8. @ CSAworkerx I’m assuming from your name you work for CSA are you here to give unbiased advice unlike Alice used to the other case wanker who was ejected from here for giving shite advice and invoicing people directly to take details to work to personally help them???

9. Dirty little sket

10. Hi, I don’t agree sorry some men don’t deserve to be sent to the cleaners every pay day for kids they didn’t even know about, its about time we had a fair system, exs need to be able to have a life and move on .

11. Some women just take of their kids without financial help or any chance of help, just get on with it you choose to have kids

12. @ lisa
    Hi lisa…yes…this csaworkerx is obviously working for this filth judging by it’s user namer and its reply to this post…it is obviously only going to offer advise on how to bleed a Nrp judging by the type of reply.
    Will look forward to replying to this one if it rattles my cage.? Could well be a replacement Alice or chall.maybe it is the troll Alice in disguise lol?
    Gonk

13. @ Gonk, we will publish her address like we did with Alice, what they dont seem to realise is the fact that they are posting leaves behind a foot print, CSA workers cause so much heart ache grief and devastation to so many families, mothers being killed by there ex for going to CSA and fathers killing themselves for CSA getting it (as usual) so very wrong, the place is abysmal and we will make sure they are named and shamed

14. Having done thorough research which we had backed up by two leading solicitors it can now be confirmed that no employer can be fined by the CSA or the Courts. Giving out your employees details to such corporations such as the CSA, Councils and the courts could lead to you being prosecuted by your employee for giving out their personal information without their consent. If any employer receives a Deduction of Earnings Order you should refrain from paying out any monies unless the employee consents to it or the CSA have provided you with hardened evidence that the employee is the liable person. This should be by way of proof by DNA test results or by written confirmation by your employee that he agrees they are the parent. Employers should note that a copy of a birth certificate is NOT proof that anybody is the parent of any child, as the Birth Certificate cannot prove identity of anybody, and it clearly states on birth certificates that they are not to be used for identification purposes. The Birth certificate is a Legal Fiction only, it is Not and we repeat NOT the human being. This is how the government trick the human being into being linked to the Birth Certificate so that the powers to be can then control that human, far fetched it may sound, but it is true, why do you think when you go to court or you are stopped by the police, one of the first things they ask you to do is confirm who you are. We are not names we are human flesh and blood beings that were born freely into this land to come and go as we please, so long as we cause no loss or harm to anybody, do not take another life or commit fraud within a contract, then the powers to be, or corporations as we now know them, have no lawful jurisdiction over us what so ever, we have only been conned over the decades to think they have. If you get a jobsworth at the CSA/CMEC contacting you demanding names of employees and how much their income is, or wanting you to fax over information to them, just ask them to prove the Child Support Act is a law. Do inform them that it is only Statutory Legislation, as is any other act of Parliament, it is an act only, or a game as some of look at it now. If it was a law do you not think they would call it Child Support law, or Road Traffic Law or any other law, we can confirm it is legislation only. If you want to confirm what we are saying is true then take a look at the Blacks Law Dictionary edition 8, you will see it states “Stautory Legislation; a legislative rule of society given the force of a law by consent of the governed” In other words it means they have to have our consent in order for them to be able to control us. Lets take a look at some examples of their statutes in the Child Support Act 1 The duty to maintain (1) For the purposes of this Act, each parent of a qualifying child is responsible for maintaining him. (2) For the purposes of this Act, an absent parent shall be taken to have met his responsibility to maintain any qualifying child of his by making periodical payments of maintenance with respect to the child of such amount, and at such intervals, as may be determined in accordance with the provisions of this Act. (3) Where a maintenance assessment made under this Act requires the making of periodical payments, it shall be the duty of the absent parent with respect to whom the assessment was made to make those payments. SO next time they demand information and start threatening you the employer with prosecution, just ask the CSA/CMEC to show you the proof that it is a law and not Statutory Legislation. You have no lawful duty to pass on personal details about anybody to a third party company trading as the CSA/CMEC, this is now being proven in courts as more and more employers are now fighting back and protecting their staff. The CSA are informing payroll departments that it is law that Employers must pass on employees income details, and if they don’t then employers can be fined up to £1000. We cannot stress this enough that this is NOT a law, it is only Statutory Legislation which only becomes a law if you consent to it. Having done thorough research which we had backed up by two leading solicitors it can now be confirmed that no employer can be fined by the CSA or the Courts. Giving out your employees details to such corporations such as the CSA, Councils and the courts could lead to you being prosecuted by your employee for giving out their personal information without their consent. If any employer receives a Deduction of Earnings Order you should refrain from paying out any monies unless the employee consents to it or the CSA have provided you with hardened evidence that the employee is the liable person. This should be by way of proof by DNA test results or by written confirmation by your employee that he agrees they are the parent. Employers should note that a copy of a birth certificate is NOT proof that anybody is the parent of any child, as the Birth Certificate cannot prove identity of anybody, and it clearly states on birth certificates that they are not to be used for identification purposes. The Birth certificate is a Legal Fiction only, it is Not and we repeat NOT the human being. This is how the government trick the human being into being linked to the Birth Certificate so that the powers to be can then control that human, far fetched it may sound, but it is true, why do you think when you go to court or you are stopped by the police, one of the first things they ask you to do is confirm who you are. We are not names we are human flesh and blood beings that were born freely into this land to come and go as we please, so long as we cause no loss or harm to anybody, do not take another life or commit fraud within a contract, then the powers to be, or corporations as we now know them, have no lawful jurisdiction over us what so ever, we have only been conned over the decades to think they have. If you get a jobsworth at the CSA/CMEC contacting you demanding names of employees and how much their income is, or wanting you to fax over information to them, just ask them to prove the Child Support Act is a law. Do inform them that it is only Statutory Legislation, as is any other act of Parliament, it is an act only, or a game as some of look at it now. If it was a law do you not think they would call it Child Support law, or Road Traffic Law or any other law, we can confirm it is legislation only. If you want to confirm what we are saying is true then take a look at the Blacks Law Dictionary edition 8, you will see it states “Stautory Legislation; a legislative rule of society given the force of a law by consent of the governed” In other words it means they have to have our consent in order for them to be able to control us. Lets take a look at some examples of their statutes in the Child Support Act 1 The duty to maintain (1) For the purposes of this Act, each parent of a qualifying child is responsible for maintaining him. (2) For the purposes of this Act, an absent parent shall be taken to have met his responsibility to maintain any qualifying child of his by making periodical payments of maintenance with respect to the child of such amount, and at such intervals, as may be determined in accordance with the provisions of this Act. (3) Where a maintenance assessment made under this Act requires the making of periodical payments, it shall be the duty of the absent parent with respect to whom the assessment was made to make those payments. SO next time they demand information and start threatening you the employer with prosecution, just ask the CSA/CMEC to show you the proof that it is a law and not Statutory Legislation. You have no lawful duty to pass on personal details about anybody to a third party company trading as the CSA/CMEC, this is now being proven in courts as more and more employers are now fighting back and protecting their staff.

15. any one posting here..if you are a nrp then listen to NOTHING csawankerx aka csaworkerx has to say..”IT” works for the csa and therefore will only offer you advise on how to quickly, speedily, effectively and but certainly not painlessly bleed you of cash.
    if you are a pwc…you are onto a winner for all the above reasons
    gonk