They’re only interested in helping one parent

November 21, 2013

They only look at taking money from the non-resdent parent and giving to the other with out explaining to the resdent parent that on reviving the money that they meant to give clothes, shoes, etc, etc down to non-resdent parent. No letter, leaflet nothing. Only interested in helping and supporting one parent. As there’s there’s single perents that won’t take there kid or kids and don’t pay a single penny. This makes me sick as a dad I would take my daughter every day if I could along with my 3 other boys in my new relationship.

Comments

8 Responses to “They’re only interested in helping one parent”

  1. Jill Betterton on November 21st, 2013 1:04 pm

    Oh stop being so biast!!! It works both ways you know!! There are plenty of resident parents like myself who give the non resident parent full access, we work to support our children and the non resident patent doesn’t not pay a penny!!
    How many times do we have to state that if you are happy to make a child then you need to support that child emotionally and financially!!! If you can’t support the children you already have then for gods sake don’t go in and produce more children!

  2. Bill Marr on November 21st, 2013 1:47 pm

    wow i was astounded how you turned a comment into a huge ego trip to make it about yourself.

  3. Jill Betterton on November 21st, 2013 2:27 pm

    I don’t think so!! Fed up with everyone accusing the parent with care as a money scrounger!! The facts are children are part of both parents responsibility both emotionally and financially and I’m afraid that is a fact!

  4. Author Chris Jones on November 21st, 2013 3:27 pm

    True Jill Betterton I agree with you. Both parents both responsible. But there are pwc that want the money but wont give contact and there are nrps that dont want to know or pay. Mu ex says they are her kids but wants money but no contact and tells them iv done nothing for them and poisens them. One is 21 n off hand the other is 17 and I still pay but aint seen them for a yr. Iv paid since we split 10 yrs ago tsken kids on hols brought xboxs tv days out etc taken them to hospital wen ill and now offered to buy them cars n help with driving but ec refused and told kids wat has he done for you. Yes dads shud pay but fairly and have contact emotionally and financially. It does work both ways but csa shud allow an nrp to live first not take so he cant eat. And a pwc shud allow contact.

  5. Steve Ayscough on November 21st, 2013 8:10 pm

    works both ways the nrp doesn’t get tax credits doesn’t get child benifi. where do you think that comes from?. If the NRP works like I do it comes from taxes so I for example get screwed by the csa every month then have to find the money to feed & Clothe my kids & keep a roof over my head in the proccess & what help do I get F all thats what

  6. Jill Betterton on November 21st, 2013 8:53 pm

    Author chris jones, from what you have put I think you are obviously a wonderful man for what you have done and I wish there were more people like you. I don’t understand why you have been denied contact unless you have a criminal record, domestic abuse, a drink or drug problem etc???? How can she stop you seeing your children, have you ever gone to court for contact??
    Steve Ayscough – yes it works both ways and payment should be fair. But please don’t know PWC for receiving tax credits as we don’t ask for tax credits its just a government payment and even couples who are together and both working get that. I do understand that NRP should be financially assessed correctly especially when they have another family to feed, but just because they have another family it’s then no excuse not to pay/contribute towards any previous children but should be done fairly. I have been in that situation too. When I was with my husband he had two previous children from two previous marriages and I remember when I first had children with him we were assessed by the CSA, at that time CSA took into consideration mortgage/rent payments so our assessment was based on that. Then the law changed and mortgage/rent payments were disregarded and our CSA payment to his ex wives went up by £400 a month!!! As you can imagine we did not have this money spare so ended up loosing our home getting into debt and it broke up our marriage. So I can see it from both points of view and I sympathise. I think everyone should get together and go back to the old ways of protesting to get CSA sorted out fairly.

  7. Gonk on November 22nd, 2013 10:14 am

    David
    I am 100% on your side here…it fucks me off beyond believe that this scum can take your money and just hand it over to the pwc without question. NRP’s have no say how or even if the money they are forced to hand over is actually spent on his kid/s, it’s disgusting, I’m robbed of over £300 each month for my daughter and no one will convince me that it’s all spent on my daughter. I know it subsidies her and her partners income and her other daughter who’s father by the way pays fuck all towards. So I’m subsidising his daughter as well
    Fucking arsholes all them, CSA and pwc
    Gonk

  8. Sarah Singleton on December 16th, 2013 4:47 pm

    Sarah Singleton liked this on Facebook.

Got something to say?