The truth about the CSA

There is one factor which is being persistently overlooked by seemingly all of you, and this is what led to it’s re-administration in 2007.

Firstly : you need to realise that this is an, “agency” in other words, that means it is publically-funded, (by YOU) so, from payments received, only around 15 per-cent is actually sent to the parent filing the complaint, the other 85 per-cent is retained by that department and paid in salaries, bonuses, incentives and to keep the agency running.. Oh Yess!! – finally getting this? ~ which is a bit self-defeatist don’t you think? in that, it’s sole establishment was to ensure money was paid to the child??? this is the first bone of contention between parents, surely they should perhaps take a less aggressive stance and more of a passive-assistance in encouraging a private consolidation which would facilitate a much lesser involvement of 3rd party infringement (i.e. ignorant staff you speak to on the phone) and ALMOST guarantee the child would recieve all of the money you intended to pay for that child in the first place.

Secondly : If the agency did address it’s hopeless failing’s in administration and re-align itself in a more wholesome way supporting the re-conciliation of parents, wouldn’t the end result be more beneficial for the child and not so aligned in it’s corporate goals for achieving targets and securing it’s own perpetuating financial security?…

This is why all you parent’s, both mum’s and dad’s are meeting such resistence from the absent parties.

I would avise uniting against the common enemy here, as they are not duty-bound in any way to assist either party, as that is NOT their primary objective.

Thirdly, a contentious issue, but a necessary one all the same, – a disclaimer should be in place, as having a child without both fully conscenting adults is a violation of that person’s human civil liberties, in much the same way that forcing an abortion is. (an issue consistently being deliberated upon in Brussels) This cannot be ignored for much longer, and is a factor which will inevitably lead to lawsuits in the future.

Finally, there is steps which anyone can take against the C.S.A firstly, if being harrased, you can easily enforce an injunction by proxy against the issuer of the letters, that must be addressed personally to usually, the head of a department, if they do not cease they are in violation and can therefore be prosecuted, the case however, would be viewed upon it’s merit.

Lastly, payment’s and arrears are calculated on projections, and allowances decreed by the houses of parliament within each fiscal year, I don’t want to dish out advice on how to beat the system, as that is not my intent, I solely wish to inform. I hope this has been of some use to all of you frustrated by a failing system with a deceptive fascade.