The CSA has been a total godsend

November 2, 2012

The CSA has been a total godsend. I’m a single mum of two and would get no support from the farther without them. They’ve tried all sorts to get out of paying and the CSA have been supportive and understanding, whilst remaining professional.

They’ve heard out both sides and got proof. The only time I had a problem was when David Blunkett got involved with the case personally and refused to let money be backdated, but we all know how bias he was and why.

I hope you give the CSA a decent and not bias review. Although it doesn’t sound like it from the advert you’ve used. The CSA is much better and more cost effective to tax payers than the old court system. Neither is perfect but when we live in a society where women are the ones left ‘holding the baby’ as well as the blame it’s no wonder that many men resent fulfilling their responsibilities.

Comments

  • acorn0306 says:

    Glad you see the CSA as your knights in shining armour . I and many other fathers did not leave their partners holding the baby,it is indeed the mother that is the problem not allowing said fathers to see their yes THEIR children,Don’t tar us all with the same brush..you really haven’t got a clue have you?

  • Siobhan says:

    Statistically speaking (1/10 cases) it’s the mother who’s left holding the baby. Socially speaking it is easier to blame the mother – a theory which was especially popular during the 1950’s. If you say that the mother is at fault in your case I have no reason to believe you but that’s a pretty rare circumstance.

  • Siobhan says:

    Sorry – I meant I have no reason not to believe you. As In I’m sure the mother is at fault in your case but that’s rare. Sorry for the typo.

  • j says:

    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

  • >