Teethless CSA are useless
‘Ex’ reneged on mutual voluntary financial agreement so CSA were contacted.
Assessment made but immediately after receiving notification of the amount he had to pay, his current wife said she’d do anything to protect her own family & they then claimed they were no longer living together.
She submitted a claim for her child that wasn’t even supposed to be his (but he did put his name on birth certificate). Their claim went through because the CSA said he’d changed his postal address for his bank so their rules meant there was nothing they could do but allow the claim.
Since they ‘separated’ the ex & his wife had another baby which she added to the CSA claim, so our original claim went from 100% (never saw that though because of their immediate claim) to 66% to 50%. ANOTHER baby is now on the way (again since they separated) so our payment will reduce to 40% when it’s born.
CSA repeatedly ignore information about evidence regarding the fictitious separation (obviously 2 pregnancies are not proof enough) saying that there’s nothing they can do because his postal address is not ‘the marital home’. This is a ludicrous & frustrating situation. The CSA have no teeth – they are totally useless …. this could even be fraud -local MP has been contacted to see if they can help.
7 thoughts on “Teethless CSA are useless”
Leave a Reply
You get money of him . Why is that not good for you them kids have just as much right to the money then your dose . You may think it hard to brying up your child with ot with out his help n pay bill ect . you have no idea how hard it is to brying up a child on mini pay CSA then have to pay your bills . If you want more money go work for it . you want have bits taken out before you even get it to make thing harder . Put your self in his shoes for onces . The 2rd family ate put though hell you have no idea hiw good you really have it .
I totally agree 2nd families are not alliwed to pay bills classed as not essential but denying them there avtivities of daily living elec heat light food warmth safe place to sleep etc isnt ese3ntual so women luke thenonebin this story can rape the mans paycheck disgustin…..rhese are rhe sort of tactics families are being forced to do to protect their kids and not be at muny grabbing nastys like this woman…….wenbu seperate the man is entitled to move on u want more muny get off yr arse n earn it…….
If the children are in the NRPs household there is an allowance for each, 15% for one child, 20% for two and 25% for three or more before a maintenance calculation is made.
If the children are not in his household the maintenance is 15% for one child, 20% for two and 25% for three or more.
So the additional children make the difference not the fact of separation or not.
Alan Gaming liked this on Facebook.
Yeah they get money but the other parent is defrauding the government by claiming seperate when there togeather this means there getting benifits so is it ok for them to get a paid wage full benifits and then getting money bk of the csa false claim but if you say thats ok then there something wrong with you
Sounds like my case at min … To all the ppl that think we are money grabbers it’s not that it’s principle the nrp has deliberately changed his circumstances so the ex doesn’t get what her kids are entitled to, his “wife” has had another 2 children since the so called separation which in most cases looks like they are still in a relationship/marriage just fiddling the system to pay less. BUT what they don’t realise is that they CAN and WILL be investigated and fined for fraud once found out!!! My advise to the person having the problems sit back, wait then LYFAO when it goes tits up 😉
I think the biggest travesty of fairness is the fact that if the mother is on benefits she receives all of the CSA payment! For example – a guy earning 100k a year has to pay 20% of his gross pay to the ex! She can still receive full benefits regardless of the amount she receives in CSA payments! Is that fair on any tax payer??????