Some questions I’d like Parliament and the Families Minister to address

June 15, 2015

Hi, I’ve written before, but in summary my ex-partner chucked me out of the family home I’d bought and has obstructed all orders for contact since 2009. She went to the CSA despite having got the house, £26,000 of my savings and failed to pay court costs awarded against her. The CSA made a DEO based on my then job and that cost me about £7500 and since I was made redundant she has now got them to snatch £20,000 of my pension. The financial claims are never ending. I have appealed to the Upper Tier Tribunal against the actions of the CSA especially given the obstruction of contact, only to receive a letter saying that it is ‘not in the interests of justice to allow my appeal’ !!!! Justice for who ? Do they know what justice is ? I am going to see my MP soon (I know I wont get far) i may then write to Judge Munby. What I’d like Parliament and the Families Minister to address is as follows:-

1. Why can a mother (PWC) ignore and obstruct multiple court orders for contact without any sanction being applied ?
2. Why is there no link between the Family Court and the CSA in that where a PWC obstructs contact it makes no difference to the actions of the CSA
3. Why cannot benefit payments be reduced or removed until a PWC cooperates with orders from the Family Court in the same way that the CSA applies Enforcement Orders without acknowledging any of the actions and orders of the Family Court or the Father’s (NRP) situation and argument in the Family Court
4. Why is the CSA permitted to secretly investigate an NRP and block his bank accounts without these actions being assessed in an open Court
5. Do we live in a secret police state
6. Why doesn’t the CSA make an assessment of the relative assets of the parties before making calculations about how much income to deduct from the NRP.
7. Why doesn’t the CSA have to reach a financial conclusion and draft a financial settlement agreement between the parties (like in a divorce) which cannot be revisited and changed (increased) on subsequent representations from the PWC (lifestyle inconsistent with income)
8. Why isn’t such a financial agreement linked to a contact order and where contact is obstructed why doesn’t the PWC forfeit payments from the CSA, Child Benefit, Other Family Benefits and the NRP.
9. Why is it not in the interests of justice for an NRP to raise these questions

We must get the law changed and a clear link between money and contact.

Rant over
David

Comments

14 Responses to “Some questions I’d like Parliament and the Families Minister to address”

  1. Yasmin Sealy on June 15th, 2015 12:30 pm

    Yasmin Sealy liked this on Facebook.

  2. Ben McCaffrey on June 15th, 2015 12:30 pm

    Ben McCaffrey liked this on Facebook.

  3. Sarah Watson on June 15th, 2015 12:30 pm

    Sarah Watson liked this on Facebook.

  4. Simon Scott on June 15th, 2015 12:30 pm

    Simon Scott liked this on Facebook.

  5. Laura Hudson on June 15th, 2015 1:00 pm

    Laura Hudson liked this on Facebook.

  6. Katrina Lawton on June 15th, 2015 1:00 pm

    Katrina Lawton liked this on Facebook.

  7. Jeanette Stone on June 15th, 2015 2:43 pm

    I totally agree with everything you say regards the injustice ! X

  8. Shaun Morgan on June 15th, 2015 8:16 pm

    Csa agency nothing to to wth care of child all they care about is financial gain on there part millions of pounds in payments not even go to the child involved in care using children for financial gain messing an ruining caring parents lives an the child in care fact

  9. Jessica Gills on June 16th, 2015 5:15 am

    Jessica Gills liked this on Facebook.

  10. Veronica Grace Crossan on June 16th, 2015 5:15 am

    Veronica Grace Crossan liked this on Facebook.

  11. Lumyong Pornpra on June 16th, 2015 5:30 pm

    Lumyong Pornpra liked this on Facebook.

  12. Poppy Wilson on June 16th, 2015 10:17 pm

    My partners ex made him leave the family home so she could move in her new boyfriend and took all he had worked for. Denied him any contact with her children (messed with their heads big time), rapidly remarried (despite being afraid of men….) and changed her childrens surnames to her new partners. 11 years later he has put his life back together and she has decided to wreak havoc on his life once again. CMS are interested only in extracting money from him. Not interested in how many lives they wreck or the fact she only wants money for gambling. He no longer works – no point……. Agree with every word you write.

  13. Poppy Wilson on June 17th, 2015 5:30 pm

    Poppy Wilson liked this on Facebook.

  14. John on June 18th, 2015 10:28 am

    I was in the same boat. screwed by the incompetent grade 1 clerks at the CSA, who made it up as they went along.

    Be careful when you see your M.P. mine initially helped and then back stabbed me. The CSA and Politicians are as thick as thieves. The CSA have stakeholders. M.P.’s are some of them.

    Ask your M.P. to involve the Ombudsman on the grounds of prolonged and continued maladministration of your case. I went to the Ombudsman but my strong case for maladministration was whitewashed to suit themselves. Like I said they’re as thick as thieves.

    Under Common law, everyone has the right to be tried by a jury of their peers. Not so with this crap system, they use the debtors prison system on decent, honest people who only want what is fair and just.

    There will eventually be a class action against the government, and the scum at the CSA. keep all your documents, in order to prove their incompetence and ask for damages when that happens.

    With regard to contact. The courts do nothing and the CSA don’t care. That has cost two children their inheritance from me!

    Good luck.

Got something to say?