She seems to think she should still get the same money
July 22, 2013
ive always paid my ex maintanance.until recently when my daughter left school and started living with me equall time .
she spends two weeks with me and two with her mum.so i stopped paying the full amount as circumstances were now different.
her mum got in touch with csa cos was not happy i was not paying same amount i always did.she seems to think she should get same money even though my daughters living with me half the time.
csa have told me they only look at what time over last 12 months my daughter stayed with me.but that does not help the present shared care time she now spends when working out a fair amount for maintanance.am not interested in past twelve months as i have already provided payments for that.our dispute is now not about last 12 months.
please help and advise
Related
Written by Mark Hudson · Filed Under CSA Advice
Related CSA Posts
Comments

Tell us your CSA story
Do you want to be heard?
Tell us your story of how the CSA has treated you. We might be able to help, and could publish your tale on the website to make sure everyone knows about the problems you've had.
Forum Login
Child Support Agency Poll
Loading ...
CSAhell.com on Facebook
Search CSAhell.com
Child Support Agency (CSA) Advice
CSAhell.com has been set up to help you with your child support agency problems. If you're having difficulty getting the CSA to listen you can tell your story here. Get advice on dealing with the CSA at CSAhell.com.Subscribe
Enter your email address to receive child support agency advice and news direct to your inbox.
Recent Forum Replies
Recent Forum Topics
-
what impact of media for children
by
aliceshaun
4 years, 1 month ago -
csa arrears after case closed confused?
by
jimgsd
4 years, 9 months ago -
Pay Your Way – Avoid The CSA
by
arealman
5 years, 3 months ago -
Can the CSA find me?
by
amc123
5 years, 6 months ago -
CSA to CMS
by
markburtonmark
5 years, 10 months ago
-
what impact of media for children
by
-
Recent Posts
- Two years battling with CSA!
- CSA: absolute sharks!
- The other side of the argument!
- How can I get help?
- Five months of incompetence!
- Press need multiple complaints to run a story!
- CMS pushing me into a corner – what can I do?
- I’ve had to leave my property – what now?
- CSA rejecting our claim – help!
- Is your latest tax calculation evidence of earnings?
- Court order vs CSA!
- Is there any point carrying on?
- CSA: total rubbish!
- Please read to stop CMS corruption!
- This institution needs looking at!
Categories
- Child Support Agency (111)
- CSA Advice (2,238)
- CSA Complaints (3,200)
- CSA Help (1,018)
- CSA Mistakes (392)
- CSA News (148)
- Events & Protests (8)
- General (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Website Updates (9)
CSA Comments
- Single Mam on What happens with CSA now I’m unemployed?
- Guest on CSA Self Employed
- Ayodeji Ayodele on What if I can’t afford to pay the CSA?
- Lorraine on My CSA Nightmare
- Ste on What will the CSA do if you are on a zero hours contract?
- Donna on What is the maximum amount the CSA can take from me?
- Julie on How to beat the CSA
- CT on Why should i pay csa if i was tricked?
CSA Websites
-
Popular CSA posts today
- I have been victimised by... 5 views | 0 comments
- CSA payments for child on... 5 views | 0 comments
- I am not on birth cirtifi... 4 views | 0 comments
- I am left with nothing af... 4 views | 0 comments
- I’m being victimise... 4 views | 0 comments
- Can child maintenance dis... 4 views | 0 comments
- Do I have to pay CSA for... 4 views | 0 comments
- The CSA are taking money... 4 views | 0 comments
- HMRC confirmed my ex̵... 4 views | 0 comments
- If the CSA closed a case... 3 views | 0 comments
Archives
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (7)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (6)
- February 2018 (32)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (20)
- October 2017 (15)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (19)
- May 2017 (20)
- April 2017 (16)
- March 2017 (19)
- February 2017 (14)
- January 2017 (15)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (35)
- October 2016 (26)
- September 2016 (13)
- August 2016 (23)
- July 2016 (22)
- June 2016 (16)
- May 2016 (21)
- April 2016 (20)
- March 2016 (27)
- February 2016 (29)
- January 2016 (23)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (30)
- October 2015 (31)
- September 2015 (29)
- August 2015 (30)
- July 2015 (70)
- June 2015 (91)
- May 2015 (93)
- April 2015 (90)
- March 2015 (93)
- February 2015 (84)
- January 2015 (83)
- December 2014 (77)
- November 2014 (86)
- October 2014 (94)
- September 2014 (89)
- August 2014 (94)
- July 2014 (93)
- June 2014 (91)
- May 2014 (93)
- April 2014 (82)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (83)
- January 2014 (97)
- December 2013 (100)
- November 2013 (122)
- October 2013 (124)
- September 2013 (120)
- August 2013 (126)
- July 2013 (124)
- June 2013 (122)
- May 2013 (124)
- April 2013 (120)
- March 2013 (117)
- February 2013 (63)
- January 2013 (96)
- December 2012 (93)
- November 2012 (92)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (91)
- August 2012 (93)
- July 2012 (93)
- June 2012 (103)
- May 2012 (93)
- April 2012 (66)
- March 2012 (65)
- February 2012 (64)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (75)
- November 2011 (75)
- October 2011 (99)
- September 2011 (60)
- August 2011 (62)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (75)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (68)
- February 2011 (62)
- January 2011 (68)
- December 2010 (64)
- November 2010 (60)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (61)
- August 2010 (66)
- July 2010 (65)
- June 2010 (61)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (60)
- March 2010 (64)
- February 2010 (46)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (26)
- November 2009 (44)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (11)
@CSAHell http://t.co/7oTvYc0lzc
Yours is a very difficult one, but here goes.
logic dictates a simple solution tell the mother you will be having the children less but then u lose.
I will suggest that you look at the CSA calculator to see how much they will actually take. It may not be as bad as u think I think at pesent its 15%. the ultimate threat to the mum then would be if you were to stop working then you would have more time to spend with your daughter and she would only get £5 per week while u had a rest. this doesnt mean do it but the thought might deter her. Or offer her the amount the CSA calculator states.
No matter how you look at it the CSA will expect you to pay.
Your a good dad dont let this crap change that
Be careful here,she’s already pissed off at you for even suggesting you give her less money despite the fact you now have your daughter 50/50. Fair most would agree unless your a greedy money grabbing ex.
I think I’m right in saying this as well,and please,anyone correct me if I am wrong?
If your ex is the one claiming the child benefit then the CSA will take the full amount from you.the mother just simply lies to the CSA telling them you do not have her 50/50……and guess what….the CSA will believe your ex without question….YOU will have to do all the hard ground work to prove over wise. And why? Because its not in the agency’s interest that you pay less. Remember, the CSA works for the pwc…it relies on the pwc whom without, it could not rob from you.and the staff there would be out of a job.
This is another example of a biased towards the pwc agency as well as an unfair one.
Gonk