No money from the CSA in almost a year – how long does it take?
I first brought my case to the attention of the CSA on 3rd May 2012 over 9 months later am still waiting for any form of payments for my 2 children. How much longer will i be waiting he is well advised by dodgy solicitor friends has changed over ownership of all his assets into other people’s names and claims to work abroad so does not need to pay.
Yet he can get weekly contact with the children, the law is flawed and maintenance needs to be brought back into courts, courts should see the full picture not just made up sob stories lies and manipulation and residential parents not being allowed to bring up the fact that the other is an actual deadbeat parent.
There is no justice for these poor children who are now forced to live a life of confusion and mind games from the deadbeat parent from having a stable happy home life.
32 thoughts on “No money from the CSA in almost a year – how long does it take?”
Leave a Reply
To be fair I say good for him, maybe ask him what he can afford instead.of being another statistic taking the ex.for all he is worth, thats the problem with some women these days, take take take,
So cos he doesn’t pay u want to stop him seeing his kids.I’m sure that’s in there best interest isn’t it
Simon:-I think the poster’s point was that the NRP claims to work abroad but still sees his children once a week. I can see no reference to stopping contact in her post.
Iram:- Even if he works abroad he is still responsible and can be liable if he is habitually resident in the U K.
It will just make things a lot more difficult for the CSA and will take a lot longer to arrive at an assessment.
Do not give up all ask the CSA to contact HMRC to investigate and be persistent with them.
12 months is not a long time for an assessment when the NRP is uncooperative and the CSA has to conduct investigations. The more information you can provide the quicker they will be.
@ wolf, to be fair, she doesn’t actually say he sees his kids every week, she says that he makes contact… That could be one by telephone…
Unfortunately Iram, the kids do suffer… It’s a pity some parents treat them as pawns… Kids are confused because the parents involve them in adult problems they are too young to understand…. The CSA will only be useful to you if you ex works PAYE and is a regular, normal, decent, hard-working guy… If he is none of the above then they will continue to ignore you because they are too lazy to investigate your claim…
@ wilf.. Sorry… Auto correct on iPad .. Sorry!
Sally:- Iram makes no reference to stopping contact or him seeing the children.
Which seemed to be Simon’s sole concern.
Hence my reply to Simon.
To be fair the CSA work for the women usually being the PWC, the posts from them always seem so oh woh is me!!! and then the women wonder why people are so bloody horrible to them because all they want is the money,
well to be fair simon you all bleat on about not having to pay if you dont see the kids so surely it should work both ways. Its never right or fair to prevent the children having contact unless there is good reason ie they are abusive etc but thats for the courts nd social services to decide. And Lisa he has just as much responsibility financially towards his kids as he ahs to see them so yes he should pay maintenence at the assessed rate by CSA.
Unfortunately this is what NRP with no morals who dont really give a toss about their kids and who put their welfare above that of their kids. With regards to csa demand that they do a full investigation into his assetsif you can name them and show them proof he owned them they can take action. Also despite him working away etc they can still get details regarding his income unfortunately you have to push CSA to do anything. Take notes of every call etc they make or you make as it will come in hand if things arent getting done. To be honest nine months really aint that long some people have had years of waiting and nothing paid because of imoral ex’s deliberately refusing to pay regardless of contact or not.
Amanda Johnson liked this on Facebook.
Amanda Johnson liked this on Facebook.
Amanda Johnson liked this on Facebook.
The CSA should be called the PWC support agency, because it gives little thought to the kids, even though they Claim to lift children out of poverty, they dont they lift mums out of the not going out every weekend poverty and pay for designer handbags and shoes, maybe all PWC should have these new sainsbury cards they are starting to use, cant buy cigs or booze, just essentials, just like it should be
so is that what you spent your child maintenance on Lisa?
Point of fact here – the new Sainsbury’s cards are not mandatory – it’s a pilot scheme what is being introduced for payment but only if PWC and NRP want it
@ Alice…. Haven’t you just had a go at someone for ‘assuming’ and here you are assuming Lisa claims child maintenance and spends it in Sainsbury’s…. I’m a female and I don’t claim child maintenance…
NRPs who refuse to pay for their child(ren) are wrong.. 100%! PWCs who use their children to get at their ex and to get more money are wrong but the people in the middle causing trouble between both by playing one off against the other to increase stats (yes, the CSA!!) are disgusting!!!
Sally:- No need for anybody in the middle nowadays.
All it needs is a mutual agreement and a request to the CSA for closure.
I know wilf… Two parents acting in the best interest of their kids… It’s so sad that money is made an incentive by the CSA… One day our wish will come true… No more CSA.. 🙂
Amanda Johnson liked this on Facebook.
I do not assume Lisa claims maintenance, I was asking a question. She has already stated that she is a PWC, she also stated on another site what she does with her maintenance money.
Also, if you read my post correctly I did not in any way infer that she spends her’s ins Sainsbury’s – I was stating that the cards are not mandatory just so that there is no confusion.
Actually yes my maintaiance is spent on exactly that, clothes shoes, food, we get CB and CTC to pay for gas electric and other basic essentials do we not???? yes we do, thats what maintaiance is for, THE KIDS not for the mums, then you wonder why so many kids look like tramps while the mum looks great in new clothes, pisses me off that many children go without
Took the CSA 12 years to get anything for my daughter, she gets a pittance that covers nothing really but hey ho, the sainsburys card might just stop kids going without food and basic essentials, they also sell clothes and shoes, i think its a better idea than cash
if it was a direct question Alice you wouldn’t have started your sentence with ‘so’…. and your tone of ‘point of fact’ you have just contradited yourself… “you don’t infer” even though you point out that she has stated what she spends her money on on another site…. you either know or you don’t… inferring is what CSA staff do all the time…. and usually get it wrong….
@ Lisa – I’m sure Alice will say that it was outwith the CSA control that you had to wait 12 years, it was the postman who didn’t deliver the information or… erm… the NRP was non-compliant… any excuse rather than accept blame for their laziness and incompetence!!
@ Sally, the CSA are incompetenet idiots, anybody with half a brain could have used the info i gave them and made sure payments were being made to my daughter probably about 8 years ago, even though i did the leg work they listened to nothing, yet the minute my husband has a csa case open money is taken from his wage and him not even notified, maybe csa just go after people who they think are eay cases, imbeciles, the place needs closing, its a disgrace
I could say anyone with half a brain could spell, but I then that would be considered as being a bitchy comment and I try to leave that to other’s on here who have double standard, like those who come on here, making assumptions that any PWC who posts a question is the cause of a relationship break-up and they are using their kids for monetary gain etc etc etc, and resort to name calling and nasty comments.
The same people also tend to be the ones who object to others who they consider to be stalkers (like the lady who stated that followed her ex’s new family, or those who use info on the net to get info to pass on to the CSA – but at the same time they try join groups and obtain IP addresses to cause trouble for others.
Some of these people are very malicious in their responses and class all PWCs as nasty vindictive people and gather a merry band of supporters in their campaign of hatred yet they fail to reveal to their band of followers that they are a PWC themselves and use the CSA to collect maintenance from their own NRP.
so hang on lisa one minute ya winging on saying CSA are rubbish and PWC are wrong for taking ex’s to CSA when they fail to support their kids yet you yourself are a PWC who took your own ex to CSA….. bit hypocritical that like
well said alice
my god, I can not believe you are all giving this women such a hard time!!
fathers should pay for their children. its absolutely disgusting when they don’t its not just for the children its also because the mother isn’t able to get a good job ect due to being the primary carer. of course she wants money???? wouldn’t you??? ever tried brining kids up on fresh air? its not easy!!! so back of this women who wants what is rightfully hers!
What part of The CSA are theiving gits did people not get, The woman who worked for CSA puts money owed to parents into her own bank account, can bet its not only her thats done it either, @ Amanda, My case was with CSA dating back to 1999, I didt exactly chase that hard did i???? Otherwise im sure i would have had payments well before 2010, Showing the CSA for what they are, They took from my husband to fund his ex,s luxury lifestyle so me contacting at that time was justified, So until you have been in that position that my family have been in with a child with disabilities to bring up that the CSA cared fuck about then i suggest i would seriously give your gob a rest, @ Alice, you have been found out time and again on this page, shown for what you really are, Go back to doing what you do best, sit at your computer and carry on being troll, or even better go and hunt down more poor fathers and take more money that they can nil afford
@ Alice, This is a fact that the CSA employees take great pleasure in lying to a PWC knowing that she will in turn stop the childrens father seeing them hence he has to pay more through the agency, Its an agency that claims to be not for profit when actually thats a lie, its also a lie that the agency from there own charter claim to “pull children out of poverty” Not from where im standing, Im not a saddo that works for them so really i have a life, i do feel sorry for anybody who has to deal with you, i bet your just like the rest of them “pay up and shut up” We dont care what the PWC does she can defraud, she can have her kids living else where and not claiming CB but the agency dont care and will still take, God help the NRP who fails to tell them a change of anything threats of fines and prison, what a joke, go and get a real job
@ alice….
i will repeat again, what i have said on this thread….
Sally on March 11th, 2013 10:20 pm
@ Alice…. Haven’t you just had a go at someone for ‘assuming’ and here you are assuming Lisa claims child maintenance and spends it in Sainsbury’s…. I’m a female and I don’t claim child maintenance…
NRPs who refuse to pay for their child(ren) are wrong.. 100%! PWCs who use their children to get at their ex and to get more money are wrong but the people in the middle causing trouble between both by playing one off against the other to increase stats (yes, the CSA!!) are disgusting!!!
The PWC in this instance is the victim!!! The CSA do NOT help the PWCs who’s ex’s refuse to pay for their children because it would take up too much time and effort of the brain dead idiots who work for the CSA to make them pay!! Similarly, it’s the decent NRPs who do pay for their children who are PAYE who are victimised because they are easy targets…
Alice provides limited information because she/he is brainwashed…. Both INNOCENT PWC and NRP are victims of the CSA… The winners are the CSA (the are in employment, no other organisation would employ them)… The ‘absent’ NRPs who refuse to pay anything for their kids and the greedy PWCs who put money before their kids….
You need to join the facebook groups child support agencies failings and be careful of some that are just bullies, like some on here. You will get free advice and support.
Alice will give you good information as she knows more than many on here, take no notice of some of them they are jealous and need to get some serious help. Ive already reported some to the Police for the threats and the Police are looking into it. Good Luck.
Amanda and Laura well said!