We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Simple answer is no. They don’t take partners income into consideration. That’s like saying if you get remarried should he pay less ???
Fair is fair kids only have 2 parents not 3 or 4
Hope this answers your question
To you??? If anything, he will pay less due to a child living with them. So, by all means, contact CSA. Your greed will only backfire.
And that money is your daughter’s, not yours. Yet another example of how a PWC thinks.
Sounds like you’re another one of those money grabbing mothers! Why should his new ‘status’ effect your child maintenance. Doesn’t matter if he is married, his wife and her wage, has nothing to do with you or the child maintenance for your daughter.
Indeed NO
Why the hell should his partner support you as well as the kids father.cheeky so and so…and yes …how bout you getting a new partner earning a good salary…you feel hard done by if the CSA took his salary into consideriation and deciding your ex should pay you less.
Gonk
Maintenance might reduce if the child has newly moved into the NRP’s household and not been taken in to account previously.
If he has a child he pays for u will get less
Another fucking leach wanting to make her ex’s life as miserable as possible….. “Can I get more money, gimme more of your money” witch!
His payment sould stay the same think yourself lucky he’s has his child at weekend so stop bitch about his new status and grow up think how u r making ya child feel
Bitching
You may find that you should be getting less. When my partner moved in with us and his ex contacted the CSA, they made an allowance from his salary for the 2 kids he lives with (who are not his), before taking off the percentage for her/their child from his salary, and when our own child is born next month, the CSA have said this will be lowered again for his other child with his ex.
Why should he pay more, that’s what always pisses me of , first wife cheated broke the family,each time i moved jobs and better salary i had to pay her more, why should i always wanting more get your new fella to pay
Money grabbing piss taker
The title of this post is misleading!?!?!?
She is not asking if she should get more money, she is asking if the amount should change given the fact that her ex has got married and has a child living with him as well as the child that lives with her…
It’s statements like the title that get peoples backs up and cause trouble on this website…. :-/
Try gettin a job
Try.moving on with your own life. He has. I cannot see.my sons this weekend due to a money grabbing ex like you.
No u are not yr not entitled to his wifes money y do u expect her to pay for kids that aint hers…………money grabber
@ Sally, fair comment and for once I will agree with you.
@ Emma, the poster of this thread, the answer is twofold, subject to which rules your case is on, If your case is pre April 2003 and the ex’s wife is working and subject to how he was assessed in the first place with housing costs etc, then there is a possibility maintenance will go up.
If the case started after April 2003 and subject to the circumstances at the initial time of calculation, then there is a fair chance that maintenance will now reduce.
So as Sally has stated, there is really to little info provided in order for adefinitive answer to your question.