My ex has changed his payments to support his new partner’s kids – how is this fair!?

12 thoughts on “My ex has changed his payments to support his new partner’s kids – how is this fair!?”

1. Give the man a break and let him be happy x

2. Unfortunately that’s the law, they are now a family unit, can’t have it both ways, how do you know the new partners ex supports the children, he may not! Would be the same for you if you “shacked” up with somebody, are you wanting there family to go without? They have bills to pay so in reality he can’t afford to give you as much as he would being single, think yourself lucky you get something from him, others are not so fortunate, you get tax credits child benefit etc, you need to budget accordingly

3. Unfortunaltey I do not get tax credits and like I say Lisa, if these were his biological children i wouldnt have an issue but I dont see why his own daughter should get less because of someone elses children.
   I also dont understand your contradictory comment about wanting my partners family to go without? Surley that backs up what I am saying?
   For the record I would not want other children to suffer a drop in payments because of my daughter. Biological fathers have a right to support their own children 1st & foremost!
   Its also not like he can’t afford it, hes minted and this is nothing more than an act of spite on his behalf. Once a control freak, always a control freak!
   He can stick his money, my daughter is all thats important to me and I am determined that she will not suffer due to her fathers greedy & selfish actions!!!

4. Luv how U say your child lolz U should b thankful U still get money so many parents get nothing. Wot do U expect ur ex to do live a life of being single just so U get more money

5. You moaners make me laugh. Whats he supposedly have to live on. No doubt if you found a new partner you wont want his help. Works both ways. Let your ex move on and you do the same

6. He has a life too. Y should he give you a penny when he got a life and he got to support they 2kids like you should support yours. If you cant support your kide then you shouldnt have kids….you both wanted kids not just the father. When you have kids you are the one the ball in your hands. The only way out of this is to get a job or if you cant look after them yourself then have family to help you out with looking after them now and then to give you a break and that will help you more and not turn the kids against the father….

7. Its because they are now a family unit….I bet she lost her entitlements when he moved in, so of course he should help financially within the household, as he would if done if he stillj lived with you! Children are not a case of they’re not his or mine, that’s a really jealous statement to make and quite damaging! If you had a partner would you not expect him to provide? Of course you would!

8. Here we go again with the haters . . . join the facebook group child support agencies failings for advice and support, no moaners, no childish insults

9. “Who made these rules?”

   The rules were introduced by the scum of the Conservative Party, and then tinkered with and arguably made worse by the scum of the Labour Party, you know, those snouts in the trough MPs that are supposedly our servants?

   But Karen has a point, don’t hate the player, hate the game, the CSA exists only to support the Treasury, not our children.

10. Here we go again
    Bloody Karen piping up as usual ONLY when its a pwc…..The system is crap and unfair to many,pwc and nrp…BUT KAREN ONLY SHOW UP AND OPEN YOUR MOUTH WHEN ITS A PWC Your are a nrp hater…bitter twisted man hater.
    Gonk

11. Karen Bedford, You clearly do not understand so i will say again,
    Karen Bedford lets play a game of “fuck” you go first

12. Relevant other children are still kids at the end of the day, yes you lose out on money but he has to now support 2 other children, nothing you can do just move on.