We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Csa dont care they still take ya money… DNA proves your child, even though your right as a father is taken away they still want ya coin
.
Hi selina,
This is incorrect, the nrp pays child maintenance whether they have contact with their child/children or not.
Regards,
Woody
My daughters dad not seen her since she was 11months old but he still has a duty to provide for her. My son sees his father thank god and he pays aswell
Oh and my daughter is now 9 years old
That is nonsense, he is liable with or without contact. Unfortunately. I would prefer they stop the mothers money if she stops contact, but they don’t give a damn about contact, only money.
thats right Tim,i actually have a cd recording with a ‘rep’ stating its nothing to do the childs psychological wellfare or rights,Just figures and cash.
Sadly DNA not needed ether ,
Im kept from seeing my kids even after a court fight and mediation. She changes her number the kids school ect. Yet demands payments
If this is true then it’s not fair on the mothers who’s ex partners choose to walk away and have no contact with there children I would like nothing more then my children to have contact with there fathers but both have disappeared of the face of the earth and I have no idea where they are. My middle child’s dad doesn’t pay for her and refuses to work so he doesn’t have to pay as he stated last time we spoke 5 years ago.
Chazz, for 3 years I hardly see my kids.have always paid yet everything is done to keep our kids away from me. I will not be able to see my darlings over Xmas, it breaks my heart.
Ive not seen mine in 7 years, yet the csa take so much off my wages its unreal.
And I know you have done everything you could to your kids Chazz Coombes just she put every brick wall in your way. Xx
I’m in the position of my ‘wonderful caring ex’ supping me seeing my son because she can and instantly ringing up the Csa so that her money goes up.
I go to court again to get the order again and then put it to them.
To her is a game of cat and mouse to get as much money as she can.
She’s good mind at this game having 5 kids by 3 different fathers and stopping us all.
Just think of all that income, she won’t have to work again!!!!!
my kids father has never seen her not that i havent tried to get them in contact might i add but he still expected to pay csa
Rui Rui Faustino-Alves i have not celebrated xmas for 5 years which is the last time my sons spent it with me. This time of year is hell its a time for families to be together and mine is broken. :'(
incorrect – in fact the less contact NRP has with the child the more he must pay – hence mothers [and it is usually mothers] stop contact as soon as CSA get involved. including those who say they have been victims of DV, one would expect them to avoid the CSA but they don’t – cash is king!