I have been polite and patient but enough is enough now
My case started in 2000, since then numerous complaints. The most important one I had to attend tribunral when the Csa had wage slips of my ex but still insisted on nil payment, he was working and claiming benefits and had to go with the benefits do nil payment. The chair person was appalled that I had to go there and they new he was working, needless to say I won in 2006/2007. Ever since I have been fighting to get a recalculation done with all the money to be amended.
I get information from the Csa which is rarely and they no the info is incorrect, they put my on nil payment when it should be minimum £5 they forget the rules changed.
I yet again put a complaint in in February, they agreed that the tribuneral money had not been back dated and also the nil assessment placed in 2012 was wrong.
So far do good both points they agreed I’m right.
Arrears I get roughly £10,000 at moment they say £3391.38 dated 26/6/13.
The break down I have is since 9/6/06 since I went on new system no mention of the arrears on old system.
£27.96 assessed on 14/9/07 had to be backdated to 18/3/05, I can’t see where this has been applied in my arrears.
They don’t seem to be listening I feel I have been let down and I’m a pain in the back side because I want what I’m entitled to.
I have been polite and patient but enough is enough now
5 thoughts on “I have been polite and patient but enough is enough now”
Leave a Reply
Your ex must be one of the 20% who do not pay and in total they owe £3.8 billion, whilst the rest of us who do get repeatedly hounded by the CSA.
It’s not YOUR money it’s your kid/s
yes its the children’s money but as things stand children cant fight for it themselves so it does unfortunately come down to the RP to do it for them. So when the new system does come in how many here are going to do the right thing and come to a mutual agreement that both parties stick to?? Most likely not very many hence the reason we have the csa which might not be fit for purpos but its what we have atm.
It is all a joke, I pay 90 pw and I have less than that to live on after I pay my other bills etc. I am left with 83 to buy my family food and get transport to wrk I get to see my kids 3 hrs per week and cannot afford to take them anywhere. The csa actually told me to use credit cards to buy them things.
My ex used ridiculous lies to the extent I had to have DNA drug tests alcohol tests etc coz sh told that many lies of course everything came back clear. I have done it all myself through reading and no solicitors as I could not afford there stupid prices. An now she is swanning around booking holidays etc calling me a bad dad. The system needs to change for the genuine fathers out there who want to see and do things with their children but the law is heavily one sided to the mother and to be honest no wonder you get so many absent fathers so the mothers can slag them off etc, why should we pay for children we are never allowed to see? If u were/are I violent thug u don’t deserve to etc but fo the honest ones what’s the point to go to work for 75 hrs per week for 83 may as well go on the dole with the rest of the trash, get my house and bills paid for . I would almost certainly have more cash to spend on my kids.
if he is on benefits – the CSA may say that he has to pay £5 per week – however, that is supposed to be the minimum a citizen is siupposed to survive on.
family solicitors will not tell you this but the CSA cannot deduct £5 per week from benefits – your ex must have had good representation at the tribunal or is a well versed LiP. especially with an evidently biased Chair – if the tribunal ordered you to attend you should attend – he/she was probably appalled that you complied with an order when he/she expected you not to – there is no sanction for CSA and PWC’s for not obeying tribunal orders.
and if it is from 2000 then he is entitled to make numerous deductions from earnings to bring it down to nil.
anyway you won in court but the children still lose out – probably a case of no contact = no money.