We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Well if ur not willing to provide there evidance they can only go on with what they have so yeh obviously is why lol
If the csa case was opened in 1998 and not being sorted from then well there can
In the CSA’s working practices an NRP is guilty until proven innocent, if you weren’t in attendance due to their mess up AND you have evidence to prove their judgement was incorrect you might have a slither of a chance by contacting your MP or a solicitor.
You haven’t provided much detail so nobody can really help, having the first commenter “lol” at you is just spiteful.
if csa just took money for a child how can they refuse to let a Dna be done if there was no marriage or name on birth certificate and they took first payment from wages, how can this be classed as admitting liability