Hardworking couple being ground down by CSA

11 thoughts on “Hardworking couple being ground down by CSA”

1. there are nowt but robbing bastards that’s why it a joke,, don’t get me wrong I think parents should have to pay towards there children but what there take a week I no it dosnt cost that to provide for a child, mw and my partner both work while the ex sits on her arse

2. Im in exactly the same position but i hav just read that tbe new scheme will not take any of ur mone y into count!! So it might be worth ur while bein on the scheme yes u have to pay to use it but u might be better off x

3. There cant make you pay as there nothing to do with u only the dads money

4. To be on the scheme where they don’t take tax credit into account it has to be a new cAse so unless the ex cancels her claim then re claims your stuck with it.im in the same boat myself .and was told I can’t go over to the new rules it’s only for new claims. So now it’s ok to take tax credits from some but not from others . I think when they change the rules they should apply to everyone not just new claims grrr x

5. Author Chris Jones liked this on Facebook.

6. I didn’t tell them my income none of there business! They ask and I just say get a legal letter asking me and they back off.. X

7. This is what i dont understand My partners claim went through in 2013 but because the silly little bitch called them in 2007 but closed the case because he was giving her more money through bank there saying that he isnt on the new scheme because they was a case open 2007??? But surely that shouldn’t be the case? It should be from when she claimed the second time AS this time they do take money of him? SO hold on a minute she gets full benefits and got full benefits when he was paying her through the bank up until 2013. Shouldn’t that be classed as fraud as she wasn’t declaring the money she was getting of him at the time? CSA make me fuc**** sick! Hard working family suffering here with two kids and all there thinking about is taking £185 of a working family for ONE child to give to a scrounging family who hasn’t working a day in her sad little life.

8. My partner told them that and they said they can find out through my tax credits how much i get. We are a JOINT CLAIM so this is wat they have done. Took all Child tax credits and working tax credits into his earnings so they work out that he gets £320 a week. Am currently on maternity leave, what gives them the right to take our child tax into his wages when we have our two children to look after? f@@@ing joke

9. If your partner received a closure letter for the case opened in 2007 then he certainly should be on the new CMS system. He should appeal using the letter as evidence.

   If on the other hand it just went to direct pay without the case being closed then you have no grounds.

   People on benefits started to receive the full amount of child maintenance from April 2010.

   All cases on CS1 and CS2 will eventually be closed and transfered to CMS.

10. They got intouch with him but because she agreed to pay directly through the bank they was never a case through the CSA so why on earth is him on old scheme?

11. A case is not automatically closed because direct payments are made. The PWC would’ve had to ask for a case closure.
    They would have opened a case to do the maintenance calculation.
    Sounds to me that even though they agreed to direct payments the case remained open from 2007.
    So unless there is a closure letter you are stuck on CS2 until they transfer you to the new scheme.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.