CSA payments too high
September 4, 2010
I have been assesed by the csa now for £88 a week. This is because they have taken into account overtime which has been payed to me over the last few months. this overtime is not garunteed, i have now worked out that if i have a pay cheque with no overtime then the csa will be basically taking a hell of a lot of money that i cannot afford to loose. I am also paying for a contact centre to see my daughter after my ex decided to lie through her teeth to the court about me.
I was under the impression that overtime that was not garunteed cannot be taken into the claim amount. Is this correct?
Thanks
Ross
Written by Ross Barry · Filed Under CSA Advice
Related CSA Posts
Comments

Tell us your CSA story
Do you want to be heard?
Tell us your story of how the CSA has treated you. We might be able to help, and could publish your tale on the website to make sure everyone knows about the problems you've had.
Forum Login
Child Support Agency Poll
Loading ...
CSAhell.com on Facebook
Search CSAhell.com
Child Support Agency (CSA) Advice
CSAhell.com has been set up to help you with your child support agency problems. If you're having difficulty getting the CSA to listen you can tell your story here. Get advice on dealing with the CSA at CSAhell.com.Subscribe
Enter your email address to receive child support agency advice and news direct to your inbox.
Recent Forum Replies
Recent Forum Topics
-
what impact of media for children
by
aliceshaun
5 years, 6 months ago -
csa arrears after case closed confused?
by
jimgsd
6 years, 2 months ago -
Pay Your Way – Avoid The CSA
by
arealman
6 years, 8 months ago -
Can the CSA find me?
by
amc123
6 years, 11 months ago -
CSA to CMS
by
markburtonmark
7 years, 3 months ago
-
what impact of media for children
by
-
Recent Posts
- Unfair amount
- Failed system
- incompetent and man haters
- Useless and threatening
- CSA not got a clue
- Aggrieved
- revised payment
- No happy
- Liability order
- CSA trying to Force the sale of my home
- Csa deo
- Don’t be a degenerate loser father
- CSA: a bunch of robbers!
- Two years battling with CSA!
- CSA: absolute sharks!
Categories
- Child Support Agency (112)
- CSA Advice (2,239)
- CSA Complaints (3,213)
- CSA Help (1,019)
- CSA Mistakes (392)
- CSA News (148)
- Events & Protests (8)
- General (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Website Updates (9)
CSA Comments
- Jayne on HMRC confirmed my ex’s lies to CSA
- Clair on CSA Self Employed
- Dontbeajudge on My ex won’t even give money for birthday presents
- kostakis Kleanthous on What is the maximum amount the CSA can take from me?
- Dave on My ex is lying to the CSA – what can I do?
- Ts on Will the CSA take my new partner’s earnings into account?
- Kate on How to beat the CSA
- unfair on How to beat the CSA
CSA Websites
-
Popular CSA posts today
- If the CSA closed a case... 6 views | 0 comments
- HMRC confirmed my ex̵... 5 views | 0 comments
- CSA payments for child on... 5 views | 0 comments
- Partner’s ex lies a... 5 views | 0 comments
- Can child maintenance dis... 5 views | 0 comments
- Can the CSA take my drive... 4 views | 0 comments
- Ex won’t let me see... 4 views | 0 comments
- How can I reopen my case... 4 views | 0 comments
- What will the CSA do if y... 4 views | 0 comments
- Can the dad stop paying i... 4 views | 0 comments
Archives
- December 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (7)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (6)
- February 2018 (32)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (20)
- October 2017 (15)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (19)
- May 2017 (20)
- April 2017 (16)
- March 2017 (19)
- February 2017 (14)
- January 2017 (15)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (35)
- October 2016 (26)
- September 2016 (13)
- August 2016 (23)
- July 2016 (22)
- June 2016 (16)
- May 2016 (21)
- April 2016 (20)
- March 2016 (27)
- February 2016 (29)
- January 2016 (23)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (30)
- October 2015 (31)
- September 2015 (29)
- August 2015 (30)
- July 2015 (70)
- June 2015 (91)
- May 2015 (93)
- April 2015 (90)
- March 2015 (93)
- February 2015 (84)
- January 2015 (83)
- December 2014 (77)
- November 2014 (86)
- October 2014 (94)
- September 2014 (89)
- August 2014 (94)
- July 2014 (93)
- June 2014 (91)
- May 2014 (93)
- April 2014 (82)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (83)
- January 2014 (97)
- December 2013 (100)
- November 2013 (122)
- October 2013 (124)
- September 2013 (120)
- August 2013 (126)
- July 2013 (124)
- June 2013 (122)
- May 2013 (124)
- April 2013 (120)
- March 2013 (117)
- February 2013 (63)
- January 2013 (96)
- December 2012 (93)
- November 2012 (92)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (91)
- August 2012 (93)
- July 2012 (93)
- June 2012 (103)
- May 2012 (93)
- April 2012 (66)
- March 2012 (65)
- February 2012 (64)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (75)
- November 2011 (75)
- October 2011 (99)
- September 2011 (60)
- August 2011 (62)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (75)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (68)
- February 2011 (62)
- January 2011 (68)
- December 2010 (64)
- November 2010 (60)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (61)
- August 2010 (66)
- July 2010 (65)
- June 2010 (61)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (60)
- March 2010 (64)
- February 2010 (46)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (26)
- November 2009 (44)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (11)
Yes, overtime is taken into account regardless of whether or not it is guaranteed, however they should be looking at what you annual average is for that rather than just a few months.
Hi Ross Barry,
An assessment will take into account a period covering the effective date and includes any O/T.
When your overtime ceases, email the agency from their website and advise them of such (keep 2 copies of the reciept you can print off).
Once you have enough wageslips ( 2 x monthy OR 5 x weekly) . Send (signed for) photocopies of wageslips and 1 of the reciepts informing them of the change.
chall – afairercsaforall.co.uk
the just pull some random amount and say pay that iam still waiting for a breakdownof what i owe but have no probssending me letters demanding money csa rapes the arse out of ya cunts what they are
Might be best to send them some pay slips that don't have over time on it but must be newer payslips than the ones u sent them and ask the to review it again
This was a reason I once had to state 2 my ex that I only received a certain amount, she reported back to CSA the amount I recieved, they made the calculations, they never knew of my overtime. I dint even let the ex know, just told her my basic. If supplying pay cheques 2 CSA, dont declare your overtime….. guarenteed or not, do not tell the CSA. They will take the balancefor themselves if your ex is on benefits and consider as extra income, they then deduct this extra amount from the ex's benefits. Guess what, u'v just bin stealth taxed by CSA. poor child has had their CSA payments stolen from them by CSA, the CSA will and do tax your children. The CSA will continue to demand the same payments even if you have no more overtime, unless you provide the payslips without overtime.
The same happened to my Husband, They don't care they just want the money to give to lying exe's. Well I say enough is enough, Its not always the nrp is at fault but the pwc.They can go out 4 times a week and we are left with nothing. Fed up with the nrp getting the hardstuff, there are women out there who use the csa for nothing but revenge on their ex and the new family. Why should we suffer through liars who say they were left with nothing when nrp's are paying them cash in hand,paying the bills so the kids don't lose out and paying off loans that the ex is still using.
When your ex says "you will never find anyone like me" and you reply "God I sure hope not…"
all you need to do is have 2 new consequtive payslips showing no overtime- as soon as you stop overtime- phone them and notify them and then send your payslips in- that way they will back date it to the date it stopped(or when u notified them if you forget to do it straight away)
i am having csa hell , i come to private agreements with my ex twat of a partner , liar that she is, : then she back out of it – ignores me as csa are saying i owe 2000 but she currently was getting 66 a week then csa decided hey thats not enough youve worked some overtime and yes i clearly did and now they want 216 a week its fucking wrong – basically she gets 15% off anything i earn – she has two other children with another guy and he must by csa rules pay 20% for them – that means for three children she get 35% off two peoples earnings that means weekly who the fuck needs to work when your on to such a great deal oh and she now gets to keep all her benefits – she is minted – our government needs to sort these fucking loopholes out its fucking wrong
i have worked overtime the past two months and have been paying regularly in to my ex bank account as to what csa recommended but suddenly i have had a letter sent from csa asking for nov/dec wageslips as she knew i had done overtime for those two months. the rest of the year i have the normal income. Will they start taking extra off me because of a difference in only 2 months wage when rest of year is same each month?