CSA keeps telling me different things
November 13, 2012
I Have been paying csa for many years now through arrestment of wages order. I went to court for my daughter over 10 years ago and was given indirect contact, which wasn’t followed through so have had no contact with my daughter since she was 5 yrs old. Thanks to facebook I have now started speaking to her and building the relationship she should have had with her father!
It turns out my estranged daughter has since left full time education and has moved out of family home (17 years old).
I have contacted CSA and keep getting told different things! They have advised it is up to me to supply proof of the above -how can i do that if I am estranged thanks to my ex!
I have been told my ex is still claiming child benefit (fraudulently) and therefore whilst she is still claiming I still have to pay, that could be until she is 19 years old.
I have reported her to benefit fraud but seem to be getting nowhere!
Ahhhhh I need advice!
Related
Written by Davie 1970 · Filed Under CSA Mistakes
Related CSA Posts
Comments

Tell us your CSA story
Do you want to be heard?
Tell us your story of how the CSA has treated you. We might be able to help, and could publish your tale on the website to make sure everyone knows about the problems you've had.
Forum Login
Child Support Agency Poll
Loading ...
CSAhell.com on Facebook
Search CSAhell.com
Child Support Agency (CSA) Advice
CSAhell.com has been set up to help you with your child support agency problems. If you're having difficulty getting the CSA to listen you can tell your story here. Get advice on dealing with the CSA at CSAhell.com.Subscribe
Enter your email address to receive child support agency advice and news direct to your inbox.
Recent Forum Replies
Recent Forum Topics
-
what impact of media for children
by
aliceshaun
3 years, 12 months ago -
csa arrears after case closed confused?
by
jimgsd
4 years, 8 months ago -
Pay Your Way – Avoid The CSA
by
arealman
5 years, 2 months ago -
Can the CSA find me?
by
amc123
5 years, 4 months ago -
CSA to CMS
by
markburtonmark
5 years, 8 months ago
-
what impact of media for children
by
-
Recent Posts
- The other side of the argument!
- How can I get help?
- Five months of incompetence!
- Press need multiple complaints to run a story!
- CMS pushing me into a corner – what can I do?
- I’ve had to leave my property – what now?
- CSA rejecting our claim – help!
- Is your latest tax calculation evidence of earnings?
- Court order vs CSA!
- Is there any point carrying on?
- CSA: total rubbish!
- Please read to stop CMS corruption!
- This institution needs looking at!
- Let’s band together and reform the CMS!
- Ex won’t take calls and CSA bankrupting me!
Categories
- Child Support Agency (111)
- CSA Advice (2,238)
- CSA Complaints (3,198)
- CSA Help (1,018)
- CSA Mistakes (392)
- CSA News (148)
- Events & Protests (8)
- General (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Website Updates (9)
CSA Comments
- Jay on What is the maximum amount the CSA can take from me?
- Jay on Dealing with the CSA when your ex partner is lying!
- Fred on No access to daughter, do I still need to pay Child Support Agency?
- Strugglingfather on CSA Self Employed
- Anthony on If I have no contact with my children, do I still have to pay the CSA?
- David on CSA Bolton
- Jay Hamilton on Press need multiple complaints to run a story!
- Andy on Press need multiple complaints to run a story!
CSA Websites
-
Popular CSA posts today
- Can child maintenance dis... 9 views | 0 comments
- HMRC confirmed my ex̵... 6 views | 0 comments
- CSA is killing me slowly 5 views | 0 comments
- Dealing with the CSA when... 5 views | 0 comments
- Not allowed to see my Kid... 5 views | 0 comments
- Forced to quit my job bec... 4 views | 0 comments
- Child Support Solutions 4 views | 0 comments
- CSA took my ex’s wo... 4 views | 0 comments
- Ex is a millionaire but p... 3 views | 0 comments
- Does the CSA take overtim... 3 views | 0 comments
Archives
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (7)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (6)
- February 2018 (32)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (20)
- October 2017 (15)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (19)
- May 2017 (20)
- April 2017 (16)
- March 2017 (19)
- February 2017 (14)
- January 2017 (15)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (35)
- October 2016 (26)
- September 2016 (13)
- August 2016 (23)
- July 2016 (22)
- June 2016 (16)
- May 2016 (21)
- April 2016 (20)
- March 2016 (27)
- February 2016 (29)
- January 2016 (23)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (30)
- October 2015 (31)
- September 2015 (29)
- August 2015 (30)
- July 2015 (70)
- June 2015 (91)
- May 2015 (93)
- April 2015 (90)
- March 2015 (93)
- February 2015 (84)
- January 2015 (83)
- December 2014 (77)
- November 2014 (86)
- October 2014 (94)
- September 2014 (89)
- August 2014 (94)
- July 2014 (93)
- June 2014 (91)
- May 2014 (93)
- April 2014 (82)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (83)
- January 2014 (97)
- December 2013 (100)
- November 2013 (122)
- October 2013 (124)
- September 2013 (120)
- August 2013 (126)
- July 2013 (124)
- June 2013 (122)
- May 2013 (124)
- April 2013 (120)
- March 2013 (117)
- February 2013 (63)
- January 2013 (96)
- December 2012 (93)
- November 2012 (92)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (91)
- August 2012 (93)
- July 2012 (93)
- June 2012 (103)
- May 2012 (93)
- April 2012 (66)
- March 2012 (65)
- February 2012 (64)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (75)
- November 2011 (75)
- October 2011 (99)
- September 2011 (60)
- August 2011 (62)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (75)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (68)
- February 2011 (62)
- January 2011 (68)
- December 2010 (64)
- November 2010 (60)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (61)
- August 2010 (66)
- July 2010 (65)
- June 2010 (61)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (60)
- March 2010 (64)
- February 2010 (46)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (26)
- November 2009 (44)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (11)
RT @CSAHell: CSA keeps telling me different things: I Have been paying csa for many years now through arrestment of w… http://t.co/RfS …
Do what we did look at the electorol register and phone child benefit of your claims. If you have to supply proof, turn the tables and say why doesn’t the pwc do the same to counter claim it. Keep on if you know youre correct, we did and saw our mp it saved us 4000.00 for an assessment csa had in place. Good luck.
If Child benefit is still in payment the CSA have to keep the case open unless your ex requests that it be closed. As your daughter is no longer living with her or in full time education she is claiming CB Fraudulently and you have taken the first step in getting this resolved by reporting her – I am not sure what evidence the CB office accept or who they go about investigating this.
contact the CSA regularly and ask them to check if CB is still being paid to your ex – also ask if they would consider cancelling your Deduction of Earnings Order whilst Cb office investigate the claim. If you are in contact with your daughter via FB and are able to provide evidence from that contact they may take this as grounds to contact the PWC and inform her than they have reason to believe that your daughter should no longer be named as a qualifying child in the case and she may well come clean and allow the case to close.