CSA case closed, now ex partner has lodged a new case
I have been paying the csa for the past 18 years. in September 2010 i was relieved that the final payment was paid. I recieved a letter to say that the case was now closed and no further payments were required. On the 8th december 2010 i have recieved a pack from the CSA asking for information regarding pay slips etc. As my daughter will be 19 in March it would work out to 4 payments.
However this is on the new rules of 15%, I told the csa about the case being closed and they said ” my ex partner has applied for a new case”and that they have to ask my to comply to the information they require. What i don’t understand is that if the case was closed surely they cannot open a new case.
Please help i’m at the end of my tether.
15 thoughts on “CSA case closed, now ex partner has lodged a new case”
Leave a Reply
shamefuly they can,i am a pwc and was on the old rules,then in april i was told i was entitled to nothing and that after numerous phone calls someone told me i wouldn't get a penny on the old rules but would on the new rules then i had to wait 13 weeks to start a new case on the new rules but you only start when your ex partner applied for this is your child in further education then??
How the hell do they backdate child support??? I don't understand! CSA always told me that you can only start claiming child support from the day a case was opened, i.e. if the child is now 2 years old and you only apply to CSA now, there is no way you could claim money for the previous period, i.e. for the first 2 years of that child's life. Am I correct? Or is it CSA that gives different info to different people?
If your daughter is now 19 that is it you do not have to pay anymore you only pay up to they are 19 if they go to secondary education.Leave education at 16 and that is it as far as I am aware, if the child moves out you stop paying too
They are soooo corrupt I hate the fuckers, and you are right they can only claim to when the claim was initiated sounds like they are trying to pull a fast one – who is the case wanker er I mean case worker? it is about time we started to name and shame these incompetent assholes
Dear Joe, I’m not surprised you are stunned by this, it is
a strange piece of legislation passed by our expenses fat
politicians. What it boils down to is that if your chilkd is still
in full time education, you still have to pay maintenance until the
19th bithday. This education must be a full time course and is
classified as full time by the college or facility providing the
course. You nee to find out the details or ask the CSA in writing
to investigate this. They have to do this by law to be able to
raise an assessment on the new case. If your child has gone on to
University you do NOT have to pay because in law they come under
the Student loan scheme and are deemed to be adults, thus not
needing your further support. You should have a case worker dealing
with your new case assessment. Contact them immediately and ask
them to prove the details of your childs full ti8me education. Hope
this helps Brucen (ex csa case officer)
Can I just point out that is wrong. LAW If the parents break up. Off to court it goes. And if the judge says the custody goes to ma…The father has no say… He has to get a parental right application…
The judge will tell the mother the child is now in your care, it is up to u to make sure they get what they need…
Not the father the mother…I did everything for my children…Never claimed a penny…
For the father to have a say with no order. Then it has to be 50/50 custody. Then yes he has a say and has to upkeep the child too.
Well said Craig !!! Again you the man. ;0)
Gents,
Under the “new system” it’s 12% gross of your salary, regardless of living expenses and other financial commitments… And if that ain’t a kick in the balls then this most definitely is; we pay until the age of 20 ( that’s right!!!) if the “child” is in further education??
And get this, the CSA write to the PWCs who have recently had their cases closed under the old systems and inform them of this development …. So what bitter, twisted blood sucking leech of an ex is going to turn down another years wages , I mean maintenance??
I found this out from an extremely smug CSA wanker… I mean worker….when I asked why they hadn’t written to me as I was due to finish in February , as I am a paying client and they are a government funded agency and supposed to be open and transparent , he replied, ” it’s the law. Call back next September to see if he’s left college!”
Why are we treated as”mugs” when we already pay without fuss what is the equivalent of a decent weekly wage to the mothers of “19-20” year old
IT’S BLOODY WRONG, GO GET THE ONES THAT DON’T PAY AND LEAVE THE DECENT ONES ALONE!!
A PWC can close a case and open a new case as often as they wish providing the QC(s) still meet the criteria – the criteria for a QC was in full time non-advanced education, entitled to CB and under up the their 19th birthday – the age limit changed on 10-12-2012 to 20th birthday.
‘Alice on December 19th, 2012 ‘
“up the their 19th birthday – the age limit changed on 10-12-2012 to 20th birthday”
Its difficult to justify really. NRP’s, (mostly men) are just treated as a cash cow for PWC’s (mostly women) or the government to ‘milk’ because without the financial input of an NRP the entire planet will blow up and we all die!!! Well maybe not but you have to wonder at the ‘reasoning’. I mean at 16yrs you can buy ciggies, have kids of your own or join the forces, so a fag smoking single mum in the TA (16/17yrs old) but still at an FE college living with her own mum who gets child benefit, qualifies as a ‘child’ for the purpose of ‘screwing’ as much cash out of an NRP as possible.
Whats even sadder than that is the fact that some on here think thats OK.
Quote j on December 19th, 2012 11:38 pm
you have to wonder at the ‘reasoning’
It’s keeping unemployment figures down!
I had a letter saying my csa case is ending a few weeks later there saying I owe apparently this is from the year of 2012 when reading through the payments they noticed not enough yearly assessment s have been made can this by law be allowed thanks carl