Categories
CSA Complaints

CSA are persecuting me

Some advice  if your wife wants you out of her life then she has the backing of the Government laws and all to make sure she has the rights to do this regardless of the rights you or children might have.

The Government created the CSA to ensure that women who exercise these rights do not cost the government anything , No the person that is going to pay the cost of those rights is you MAN.

So Equal rights means if a woman wants to she can use the system very well , must be why divorce rates have soared from just 3000 a year in 1973 to 150.000 a year in 2008.

So how much longer will this go on until Good men and Good Women will see this as a leading political Agenda item  and we have some legislation that stops this breakdown of marriage and the family and we have a true family friendly politician , one that will actually stop legislation that supports the persecution of fathers and ruins the life of children.

Someone tell me how we start a new political Party and I’m up for it .

I’ve been persecuted by the CSA for 17 years I’m 50 years of age and the CSA are still stealing money from me and my children will never see a Penny of it – Now that’s what they call Child Support !!

14 thoughts on “CSA are persecuting me

  1. No need to start up a new Political Party there are now groups including ourselves who are now starting to fight back and expose what these morons are doing, and guess what they hate us for it.

    The CSA or CMEC are hiding behind smoke screens, however again we are opening up these smoke screens and we put Kitty Ussher on the spot and asked her to tell us what percentage of Child Poverty is caused through parents splitting up, the answer from her was ….. ” we do not have a figure we go off lone parents, we stated that was not the question we asked we asked what percentage of Child Poverty is caused through parents splitting up, she looked at us witha vacant look, there was our answer, all this End Child Poverty stuff is being aimed at divorced fathers, quite rightly as you state if your wife wants you out of her life then she has the backing of the Government laws and all to make sure she has the rights to do this regardless of the rights you or children might have.
    Just look at what ministers think about divorced fathers, “dead beat dads will be made to pay, absent dads will be tracked down and made to pay, fatherhood should be made taxable, no mention of dead beat mothers, runaway mums are never mentioned, the CSA are persecutors and are there as another stealth tax on fathers who have become divorced whether he likes it or not, the mother knows the power of this corrupt government are behind them.

    http://www.deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk along with other groups are fighting back so now the fight is on, come and join us and help us help you stop this persecution

    Dead Beat dads

  2. Your more than welcome to have a look at http://www.afairercsaforall.co.uk/ ~ we also have a busy forum.

    afairercsaforall was created in April 08, the forum already has 540 + members ~ there is no membership fee and we request no financial contribution to aid the running of either website.

    We offer support both resident and non resident parents.

    Best wishes to you all for a Happy New Year x

  3. What makes us laugh is all these charities sites and organisations who state they are campaigning against Child Poverty but then either complain about about how the CSA operate, or attend meetings to say how good the CSA are doing, but then have no idea of what percentage of child poverty is caused through parents splitting up or more to the point they do not know whether divorced parents is actually anything to do with child poverty.
    The CSA use this Motto “We are reducing Child Poverty by 2010″ ministers such as Geraghty, Ussher and other antimisandri politicians are happy with their statements in their end of year financial statements ” we have recovered an extra 12.5 billion pound from 2007 to 2008 and this is going to the children that need it and we are glad to be reducing child poverty” As stated before we asked when we attended a meeting with Kitty Ussher at Caxton House back in November what percentage of Child Poverty was caused through parents splitting up, she stated there was no figure,or they go off lone parents.
    Divorced dads are nothing to do with Child Poverty, the CSA are just another stealth tax office on fatherhood, Child Poverty is Political. If the government wanted to reduce child poverty then they could do it within weeks, up the benefits get lone parents out to work ooops sorry that one has been tried oh and guess what all these lone parent organisations are now up in arms because it is picking on the mums, all hell is raised because the Government are now urging mums to go back to work, but its all there in the newspapers “mums should be at home to look after their kids, is this not putting pressure on mums having to take kids to school then go to work then back to pick the kids up from school this is putting pressure on the mums and it’s not fair”

    So its ok for the mums who play the corrupt system sting the father for 40% of his wages then throw in a Liablity Order so they can sting him even more with corrupt baillifs, cause him to fall into financial hardship, then if he dares to go and do a second job they want a percentage of that wage too, back to the CSA greedy mum goes get the law on her side to sting him again in comes CSA/CMEC to take that money too.
    Dad loses car, cant get to work, loses job, can’t pay his mortgage or rent on the small one bedroom flat , dad out onthe streets can’t get benefit as he has packed his job in voluntarily, can rent anywhere as he has no money , how is that for pressure? however this acceptable because it’s the male, try that with the mother, get her out to work so she is not putting too much pressure on the benefit system then all hell breaks lose. How will all these ministers react when they have ploughed ever divorced dad into poverty and they find they cannot recover any money to reduce their so called Child Poverty then?
    Its all corrupt and a big smoke screen

  4. What makes us laugh is all these charities sites and organisations who state they are campaigning against Child Poverty but then either complain about about how the CSA operate, or attend meetings to say how good the CSA are doing, but then have no idea of what percentage of child poverty is caused through parents splitting up or more to the point they do not know whether divorced parents is actually anything to do with child poverty.

    Really? ….

    ~ the feeling is mutual 😉

  5. i am sick and tired of men complaining about women persecuting them through the csa. what about women in my circumstances where my childrens father have gone to live abroad just so they don’t have to pay? my eldest is 19 now so even he decides to come back to face his responsibilities he still wont get a penny but as my youngest is only 13 there’s a fat chance of him coming back to do that. 12 year has passed and they’ve had nothing, although he did send them 25 pound each for christmas this year, i bet he thinks he’s a hero.

  6. Well Christine thankyou for that vote of confidence for fathers that DO pay and are caught up in this system, you seem to be of the bias that most females are that if a woman PWC has gone to the CSA in the first place then the father must be a dead beat, unpaying, shirker!!
    On the note of what do women such as yourself do in your position?, well pardon anyone for saying but surely you have an inkling of what these ” males” will become as fathers once you have lived with them? You would soon become aware if they were going to be suitable hard working fathers! if not then why go on and have children with them?!!
    So therefore the balance is there, every parent has a responsibility to their child/ren but even so , every woman has the right to decide if a male is suitable father material. Funny how women cry wolf the minute the father disappears and doesn’t pay! Perhaps this should have been thought out and of before bringing innocent children into the world? food for thought perhaps?

  7. For your Information I’m in a Happy relationship have been married again for 12 years and Know that there are some women out there that wonder why women are called the fairer sex.
    My Wife is ashamed of the people that dare call themselves women, thank god that all women were not created equal , again I think we need some politcal clout to stop the CSA / CMEC it’s the only answer to a fairer Society.
    I helped found NACSA and have been calling for the Abolition of The CSA for 15 years Now it’s time it happened.

  8. Perhaps these females should be asked under oath how they intend to support the kids after the split. I suspect the answer will be Uhhhh uhhhhh duuhhhh giggle giggle uhhhhh, why benefits silly, my army of social workers, state lawyers, and councillors said so, giggle giggle. uhhhhh can i smoke in here.

  9. Please be aware – SB is one of AKA’s used by the Barnett’s, who are founder’s of ‘deadbeatdads association’.

  10. Sb is not actually my AKA, Chall- AKA Tracey ok? it is actually MY initials. Please do not refer to us as ” The Barnetts ” either, i am Ms respectively and he is Mr ok?
    I have said nothing on here that i am bothered in the slightest about whatsoever, and i stand by whatsoever i have written in repsonse to anyone, yourself included.
    Hope that has cleared matters up and you can now enjoy your Sunday evening, bless 🙂

  11. LOL @ you Sherri… Your a card!

    Your user name is ‘tigereyes’ on here one day and ‘SB’ the next – How many other user names do you post under in an attept to disguise yourselves.

    People are not daft you know… 😉

  12. so are we to take it you are mods on this site too hmmm something going on being able to get IP addressess and passsing them on, seems to a bit of a past time with you passing on peoples IP addresses oh a stalking other users in different forums

  13. Tracey= i never think for one minute folk are daft, Tigereyes is my name from PCF and SB happens to be my initials,so wheres the problem in that?? As you rightly stated,well half rightly, i shouldn’t have put my e mail address but you see i did because what do i have to hide? absolutely nothing, were you under the impression that i wouldn’t want you to know who it was? errmm, hello, i’m not that thick!! so Sherlock Tigereyes and SB are one and the same, whoop dee do!
    Glad i made you laugh!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.