graeme says:

Maybe if they were to read the complaints on this website alone they would have a great idea for their research material.
The statement “with more than 850,000 children benefiting” is wrong. It should also read “with more than 850,000 children going without or being forced into poverty because of the actions of the agency by the way they target nrps who have moved on with their lives, created new families and the children suffer through that way.
They should also means test PWCs. Ensure that the CM paid to them is exactly for that… CHILD MAINTENANCE. nOT FOR NEW SHOES, MAKE UP NIGHTS OUT ETC.
They should also change the law that if a PWC denies access to the NRP or in any way hinders access then the NRP should not pay CM. That way estranged families have a better chance of survival.
The main change should be… one law, one assessment… everybody in the system on that assessment.
If a PWC is on benefits.. then the actual benefits should be stopped if she is recieving CM. The amount recieved should offset benefits. This obviously depends on the NRPS income etc.
The Agency should be a highly trained body. With professional and courteous staff. Not the morons that is already working there.
Investigations. On no account should the word of either parent be taken at face value. The agency eed toinvestigate thoroughly either side of the story. Should anybody lie then action should be taken against them..
This also goes for agency staff as well.
The Law needs to be changed dramamtically. On no account should liability orders issued. Both sets of parents have a god given right to further their lives and that includes putting a roof over their heads for themselves and their new families.
I could go on but these are some of my initial thoughts.

Please feel free to add to them. Then maybe the original poster can pass the information on to the research body. That should make good reading material.
Combine this with the information on this website then they will have an excellent idea on how this shambolic bunch of thieves have destroyed peoples lives. Both the NRP and the PWC.

Have a nice day. (Unless of course you work for this agency… then i hope that the fleas of a million camels infect your anus and cause you untold grief, misery and suffering, like you cost us.)

Graeme

chickpea says:

I totally disagree with comments like’ child maintenance should’nt be used for hair, make up etc’ No it should’nt but PWC(male and Female) are also spending money on the children. They don’t sit there and wait for the CM to come through every month and provide food, clothing etc then nothing until the next payment. Everyday money is being spent on the children food, gas ,electric, school dinners, bus to school, tolietries, spending money clothing,hair cuts, the list can sometimes be endless. I can’t understand some PWC’s actions just like i can’t understand some NRP’s who think £10.00 a week goes anywhere helping to provide for their child/children. Yes some PWC’s are on benefits ‘and don’t get off their backsides but then again neither do some NRP’s.

Tracy Button Sallis says:

Well done csa. You're helping the mothers, and tearing other families apart leaving 2nd families deep in debt and sometimes homeless. You're killing good fathers. Yeah, pat on the back

Steve Pelikan says:

propaganda! blowing smoke up there arses and trying to big up the csa and the wonderful work they are doing! not!! when you cannot afford to live because of the deductions they make false assesments arrogant staff threats of action for arrears that they cannot justify! the sooner they are closed down the better!!

Lee Hughes says:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldhansrd/text/101221-0002.htm#10122155000090

Bob French says:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1181169531This woman Tammy Dean has all the benefits coming out of her ears has a job as a care worker gets a war pension her partner gets a military pension and has his own business and she is the managing director of his business.She made a false rape allegation against her ex husband ruined his army career so he had to leave after 16 years no pension for him. she told many lies and stopped him seeing his daughter. in the first place she had asked to have children he had said no a couple of months later she told him that she was pregnant and has the child anyway.With all of the money she is getting already she still wants more and that is purely to ruin the ex husbands life yet again. He is now faced with poverty unable to feed himself does not have the money to get to work so he is going to have to leave the job which he loves and is well respected in to go on to benefits. This is what the CSA do to people, they go after men who are already paying but because they cant catch others so they go for the easy target and rape them financially. that is how they have that figure not by collecting from people who are not paying. They shat on the ones who are and who are willing to pay. Incidentally I am the ex husband who had the fictitious rape claim against me and I am about to lose everything again because of this greedy vindictive bitch Tammy Dean.I wonder what my daughter Poppy will think of her mother when she finds out the truth. She has now pushed me over the edge and as for the CSA and not listening to me telling them I cant afford to pay the money they were asking and ignoring the amount which I could pay well now the war is on. lets see how many of those give up working for the CSA in 2011

Paula Halsey says:

more lies and bullshit from the csa. Funny they are not able to produce the figures paid out in compensation for all the maladministration claims.

Susan Ward says:

They only collected this amount by bullying and threatening the NRP. I is interesting to read they have helped the single parent (AGAIN). What about helping the NRP and their second family.My husband did have an agreement with his ex, which at the time was great. Well that was until i came along, then the greedy lying ex girlfriend got the csa involved so she could ruin our lives (her words). She thought she would split us up, BUT she didn't know me ha ha.I will fight her and the csa until we get a fair deal.

Sarah Ambrose says:

I totally agree that we need to get together and insist the CSA do their job legally, fairly and within a decent time scale. The more there are of us fighting for this, the stronger we will become. I have written to all television channels and am going to start on newspapers this week. Fundamentally the system DOES NOT WORK, whether you are a PWC or a NRP. they money they claim to have collected is from easy targets, those with full time employment who do not have the where with all to fight, or make sure any assessments are correct. If any case needs extra work, or is 'complicated' they ignore it. We need to make the CSA accountable! And then on from that the Government!

Craig Bulman says:

Note how they say single parents on benefits my first ex wife chose to stay on benefits even though she could earn double of what I did a lot of the time they choose to stay on benefits because everything gets paid for. why do they not come and interview the NRP who is getting shafted and financially raped because the ex is all bitter and twisted and wants to ruin their life nothing to do with about paying for the child. All greed and venom – isn't it Tammy Dean of Wallsend Tyne and Wear NE28 and Carol Anne Bulman of Farnborough?

Sarah Williamson says:

Just realised I put NRP in the first post, meant PWC. Oops! Sarah A is right, they screw both sides over equally it seems, we need to stay focussed!

Sarah Ambrose says:

haha nic one Lisa, so who is this meeting with and when? Can we not all come??

Allan Morrell says:

The CSA like feedback, I just gave it to them… 2 walkie talkies together, the one recieving on high volume, went through the dial up process till I got a staff member, and transmited the feedback high pitched whistle down the fone, ear ache and head ache are the first symptoms of reciept of this kind of feedback…. anyone can do it, I suggest our nxt fone calls are done in this way!!! anyone who is intent on returning the hurt they have suffered from these greedy arrogant and ignorant imbociles can do this…..Oh for the memories of childhood with electronic gadgets like microphones and speakers creating high pitched feedback…. Amazing how such simple devices can cause ear-ache and headaches!!!!!!

Craig says:

Well Chickpea I appreciate that children do cost money to
bring up but not the amount the CSA take from the NRP. Surely the
NRP is entitled to a life after the divorce too. And why should the
NRP have to pay anything to a PWC who refuses to let the NRP have
access to his children????? Now I am not saying all PWC’s are like
this but my ex wives are and they have used the children as a cash
cow. I am about to lose my job as I will be unable to cope as I
will have nothing left but yet one of my wives Tammy Dean of
Wallsend Newcastle Upon Tyne NE28 has all the benefits coming out
of her fat hairy arse has a job as a care worker gets a war pension
has a partner who gets an army pension for 22 years of service and
has his own business – and she is managing director of his business
– do I smell a tax fiddle there? I told her I did not want children
yet she goes a head and has one anyway, makes a false rape
allegation against me and accuses me of being violent. She ruined
my army career – I had done 16 years I only had 6 years before I
would have received my pension. I have only just settled into
civvie street after leaving the army in 2002 and now my world is
about to fall apart yet again. As for my first wife Carol Anne
Bulman of Farnborough has sat on benefits for years even though she
is perfectly capable of earning good money, why should she work
when she lives off the teat of the state and gets money from the
CSA. Some PWC’s use the CSA to be vindictive so they should not get
money and they need to be means tested.

Tracy Button Sallis says:

I agree it's not just the 2nd families who are suffering. The CSA are arrogant, and useless. It's time they were shut down for good.

chickpea says:

Craig!
Means testing a PWC is’nt is’nt a viable solution..One week children cost less than another week. What happens when a child needs a lets say new bed? Beds are’nt cheap, we have 3 children who are always needing new things, 3 winter coats £120, 3 pairs of winter boots £70 not to mention scarfs, hats replacing gloves on a regular basis the list is endless. I think alot of NRP’s forget how expensive it was when they were still with their partners. Access and CM cannot be linked, why should the kids go without just because the parents are acting like a couple of imbeciles? Yes i wholeheartedly agree NRP’s are entiltled to get on with their life, but in the mojarity of cases the PWC’s are forking out more every month to just keep a roof over their heads and provide 24/7 for the kids. Lets say you are paying CM of £100 per month, The pwc is paying out more in rent utilities food clothing etc.

Fred says:

Do you not see a pattern here…………Have a
relationship,have baby,split up,claim csa,sit on
arse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! At this rate as well as having enough kids for
a football or rugby team. The money she’l be raking in it could
bolster up the UK economy. And i know she’s doing the csa thing out
of spite because she told me so,because when we did split up and i
was in another relationship,that as long as i was going out with
this slut girl (in her words) she would make my life a misery and i
would never see my child again. Well this “slut girl” as she puts
it is worth 50 of her and is now my wife. She has 2 kids i call my
own from a previous marriage. I did say to my ex that at the end of
the day when my daughter is old enough to think for herself and not
get brainwashed by her mother,she will come looking and then she
will find out the truth.

Fred says:

She may have a right,but what about the NRP, don’t they have any rights to a new start and a half decent right to live. What damn right does she have to ruin my life out of spite. It’s parasites like my ex that pee me off, if it was still law that they burnt WITCHES (and what a shame it isn’t) ,she would be first on the pile.

Karl Garrett says:

It’s quite simple, women are toxic, money grabing witches, and basically, DONT HAVE CHILDREN. I wish I got told this when I first met my ex, then I definately wouldn’t have had any!. The CSA and the EX have condemend me to a life of poverty, so whats the point in carrying on ? – it’s always one sided…..

Fred says:

Just a question chickpea to your reply on the 9th, you bang on about NRP’s and all that. I notice you mentioned there were several tv’s left on in your household at any one time. Either your doing very well for yourself or if you feel that strongly about the bills that you have to pay then wouldn’t it be common sense to get rid of 2 of the tv’s and save on some electric and put it towards a new pair of shoes or coat? or do they have a ps3,xbox or Wii attached to them. Also you could turn the heating down a notch or two,it costs nothing to put a jumper on.

Craig Bulman says:

Chic Pea
Yes children do cost money but not the amount which gets taken from the NRP.
A new bed strewth the amount of money the CSA are taking from me they could get a new bed every week. Incidentally one of my daughters is 18 she is an adult she has a job – when I was 17 I was serving my Queen and country by the time I had turned 18 I was on an operational tour. it is total and utter shite we have to pay until they are 19 if they go on to secondary education all that is doing is teaching them to get pregnant to have kids so they can jump on the benefits gravy train.
When the PWC is on benefits they have everything paid for where as the NRP has to pay rent, council tax etc all of that is paid for the PWC on benefits.
Meanwhile back at the ranch I am going to have to leave my job as the CSA are taking 40% of my wages and I am unable to keep up with my other outgoings
The CSA are terrorist who commit fraud and are in breach of the NRP’s human rights. Look at what is going on in North Africa because that is coming to the UK
If the PWC and the NRP were still together that amount of money would not be spent on the child every week – it all goes towards the CSA bonus’s they were paid 25 million in bonus’s last year I wonder where that money came from?????