We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
How many more greedy woman are going to come on this site? Get a life and stop living off others.
I agree
It’s all about money and how much can I get with you greedy bitches
Gonk
I’m assuming by your written communication you had a very limited education Kerry…. were you brought up to believe that men were a meal ticket to help you avoid working?
I’m guessing you are on benefits, get your rent paid for you, council tax paid, child benefit…. and that YOU don’t contribute a penny (that you have earned) to your childs upbringing and yet you have the cheek to expect MORE money from the childs father….
Need I say more?!?
Another nasty vile greedy bitch, its all about money, never about the kids, makes me sick, all these men (walking banks) having to foot the bill for these illigitimate children are only wanted for career purposes of the benefits lifestyle, gives good mums a bad name
………and the DWP and politicians support this ‘lifestyle of the rich and the famous’, on benefits.
i’m not on benefits i don’t housing benefit paid for me i live with my partner who works full time i work part time and study as well as look after 3 kids bet your all on the scrounge if my ex partner was paying proberly then i wouldn’t of asked the question you silly people i’m far from greedy the money i get gor my kids goes straight on the kids and if my ex wasn’t conning thye system then i wouldn’t be in this situation you silly muppets.
Before you go round putting people down maybe you should think of it from thier point of view before saying they are greedy bitches some men are men they do everything for the kids but unlike my son dad he can’t be bothered at all so please back off because you do relise these messages are monitered and you could get into alot of trouble for bullying sp please back off me me alone before you all get into truoble you sad silly people who don’t have lifes
My partner is working part time and paying for his 3 children via the CSA. His ex wife is now demanding extra money of him for the kids and has said if he doesn’t give it to her then he cannot see his kids? Does she have a right to do this, what can we do?
you could ask for a reassessment on this basis but might not make much difference
@ Florence – No she doesn’t have the right to do it but there is nothing stopping her…. the CSA actively encourage PWC to reduce overnight stays with the NRP so that the PWC gets more money and the only way the NRP can dispute it is through the courts (at the cost of £thousands of pounds) and even then the PWC can ignore the court order and nothing is done….
The whole system is unfair, we took my partner ex to court once but she completely ignored the court order and said that the kids were ‘ill’ every time we went to pick them up (a lie on her part) and nothing was done… CSA are only interested in money…. 🙁
sally – what evidence do you have that the CSA actively encourage PWC to reduce overnight stays with NRP to get more money? the system encourages it and I suspect it happens but is there a documented case antywhere?
as for kerry – if you are so busy looking after 3 children then why not let dad/NRP have more contact with his son maybe its a case of him not paying properly because you are abusing the kids by not letting them see him properly. it is understandable that he can’t be bothered as it will cost him emotionally and financially to go to court.
dependent on the facts of this case I’m afraid I echo the comments of Lisa either wholly or partly
and if you have too many kids to look after then you should have kept your knees together? only the feminazis would blame you if you were a mum who stayed at home to look after her children but you want to have your cake its seems.
another wind up post methinks?
@ dai… The only Evidence is the amount of NRPs who have complained about the reduction of overnight stays when the CSA get involved and a PWC admitting that is what the CSA told her to do.
Lots of PWCs have said that CSA staff have told them they will get them more money if they use the CSA but it has backfired on the PWC and they have complained on this website… The easiest way to get more money is to reduce overnight stays..
In our case the CSA told my partners ex that my income would be included as part of the assessment (wrong, we only got together in 2010, CSA 2) and the greedy c@w had it already accounted for and when she realised the CSA got it wrong she reduced the overnight stays to get more money (her words)…the only people who could have told her that were the idiots at the CSA…
However, the basic answer to your question, is that there is no documented evince to support this…