We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Peter Barraclough liked this on Facebook.
I dont think its all cases, the CSA is changing as we are all aware and new cases will go through a new system. Old cases won’t start changing to the new system until, I think Aug-Sept but it could take many months to get old cases and claims swapped over.
No twats are charging 20 percent on top of what your already paying for their fees. Naughty!
My letter said August – funny how they didn’t do a single thing for 9 months then miraculously managed to take a payment just before the new charges come into play !
our case has been put befor the minister as csa hav admitted mass maladministration causing whoppin arrears minister has said they look for csa to hav all power in land and to apply to parliament to get the arrears for a debt they hav not only inflated and proved in court still chasing wrong amount and ice have bked up their figures even tho a court n appeal unit have told the csa they are WRONG……..i hav now written to the minister explaining a few facts and thst we will ne seeking compensation………..so no there not ending it just migrating it to 2012 rules were the bastards now charge too…..weve signed nothing so we have no contract with them and are able to sue them for 20 years of admitted mismanagment………….agency is disgustin none of its about the kids none of it…..otherwise 2nd family children would matter 2 instead of having to go without as their tax credits are stolen to pay a child who already gets his own…..
If you can’t support wot comes out from your body then don’t have any kids then. Simple. Don’t pass it on to the fathers . Without fathers you won’t have kids. If you want a car do you ask ford to fill it up??
Męssągẻ Fącẻbøøk liked this on Facebook.
Paul Jones liked this on Facebook.
David Mortimer liked this on Facebook.
Closing all CSA cases yes… CMS will take over and re open the cases with added interest
I thought that the 20% payer and 7% receiver was only for new cases? I don’t see how the system is fair. Most women use CSA as a way just to spite the father, I can’t see many women paying the same towards the child’s upkeep as what most men pay. I would gladly have a private agreement, but my ex only wants to hurt me in any way possible so I’ll be stuck with the incompetence of the CSA for the next 12years.
Andrew Jones would you be so kind as to tell me this weeks lottery numbers as obviously you can tell the future.
It takes TWO people to make a baby which means that BOTH the parents are responsible for that baby/child.
@Bella
yes you are right, it takes 2 to make a baby, but you are wrong about both parents being responsible for the child. History with the csa and greedy mothers proves that, the nrp, normally the father is the one that’s bled dry for yrs by these parasites, and by parasites,I mean an aweful lot of mothers to, that use the kids as cash cows.
Gonk
20% for the NRP and a small percentage to pay for the PWC. It all comes out of the money the NRP has to pay so as usual they get penalised whilst the PWC gets away scott free
I have to agree with previous comments ive read,my ex abusive partner is apparently self employed (apparently) but has drove a works van and logo clothing for he same company for past 9years!?! Im still ringing csa constantly to push for a new assesment as hes declaring alot less than hes earning.
i dont agree with the previous comments over women using csa for their own gains.please dont tarnish us all with the same brush..i have let a man who abused me mentally and physically over 15 years let him see our two kids frequently,offer him to take them away to which he was too ‘busy’ and tried as amicably as i can to talk to him for the children..the reason i have gone through csa was for my children,not out of spite.
New CSA will soon be rolled out to N R Fathers…..I was a great dad to my two sons & left my ex wife as I could no longer live under the same roof. I should still be seeing my sons but my ex has thrown the works in at court so I have NOT seen my two sons for 4 years in August 2014. Yes went to court & lost my custody battle.
I will tell you how the New CSA rules how it will affect me & you may be able to compare it to your own…….
Old CSA payments
Right My current CSA is £450 per month never missed a payment………
New CSA rules (If i CAN get a family based agreement)
I will pay £152 pounds per week or £658 per month…
New CSA rules if i CANT get a family based agreement)
I will pay £182 pounds per week or £788 per month.
Under the new CSA rules if the CSA administer the payments it will cost me a whopping £338 MORE…..
Thanks CSA