An evil woman is fraudulently taking money from my husband
June 12, 2013
My husband has been a victim of the CSA he has had £600 of his £698 pay check taken this month and he does not even know for which children this is, as mine are his only children in this country. We suspect it may be an evil woman who put my husbands name on her children’s birth certificates without his knowledge until her children were taken into care.
She now has her children back and appears to be fraudulently claiming child support through DEO. How is it possible that the CSA can take money from someone with out being sure that he is the father of the children? Surely this is illegal? My husband is willing to take a DNA test to prove that these children are not his. The CSA is taking money from him that should be for his actual children not the poor children of this despicable woman.
Any advice you can give on how to proceed and also how to reclaim the money already taken would be much appreciated.
Written by Suzi Sanyang · Filed Under CSA Advice
Related CSA Posts
Comments

Tell us your CSA story
Do you want to be heard?
Tell us your story of how the CSA has treated you. We might be able to help, and could publish your tale on the website to make sure everyone knows about the problems you've had.
Forum Login
Child Support Agency Poll
Loading ...
CSAhell.com on Facebook
Search CSAhell.com
Child Support Agency (CSA) Advice
CSAhell.com has been set up to help you with your child support agency problems. If you're having difficulty getting the CSA to listen you can tell your story here. Get advice on dealing with the CSA at CSAhell.com.Subscribe
Enter your email address to receive child support agency advice and news direct to your inbox.
Recent Forum Replies
Recent Forum Topics
-
what impact of media for children
by
aliceshaun
4 years, 10 months ago -
csa arrears after case closed confused?
by
jimgsd
5 years, 6 months ago -
Pay Your Way – Avoid The CSA
by
arealman
6 years ago -
Can the CSA find me?
by
amc123
6 years, 2 months ago -
CSA to CMS
by
markburtonmark
6 years, 6 months ago
-
what impact of media for children
by
-
Recent Posts
- No happy
- Liability order
- CSA trying to Force the sale of my home
- Csa deo
- Don’t be a degenerate loser father
- CSA: a bunch of robbers!
- Two years battling with CSA!
- CSA: absolute sharks!
- The other side of the argument!
- How can I get help?
- Five months of incompetence!
- Press need multiple complaints to run a story!
- CMS pushing me into a corner – what can I do?
- I’ve had to leave my property – what now?
- CSA rejecting our claim – help!
Categories
- Child Support Agency (111)
- CSA Advice (2,238)
- CSA Complaints (3,206)
- CSA Help (1,018)
- CSA Mistakes (392)
- CSA News (148)
- Events & Protests (8)
- General (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Website Updates (9)
CSA Comments
- Stuart Hogg on I’ve finally beat the CSA
- Donna Brown on My ex doesn’t have a fixed address and it’s causing problems
- ruthcsx on Forum Login
- ruthcsx on Advice needed on battle with CMS
- Dadbodguy on The other side of the argument!
- John Green on How have the CSA got a hold of my bank details?
- Ashley on CSA ruined my life
- Ashley on CSA ruined my life
CSA Websites
-
Popular CSA posts today
- Do I pay CSA if ex puts c... 7 views | 0 comments
- HMRC confirmed my ex̵... 6 views | 0 comments
- Loophole in CSA protocol... 6 views | 0 comments
- Ex keeps quitting job eac... 5 views | 0 comments
- No CSA maintenance becaus... 5 views | 0 comments
- CSA Calculator WordPress... 4 views | 0 comments
- What will the CSA do if y... 4 views | 0 comments
- Can the dad stop paying i... 4 views | 0 comments
- CSA took my ex’s wo... 4 views | 0 comments
- How do the CSA know if I&... 4 views | 0 comments
Archives
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (7)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (6)
- February 2018 (32)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (20)
- October 2017 (15)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (19)
- May 2017 (20)
- April 2017 (16)
- March 2017 (19)
- February 2017 (14)
- January 2017 (15)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (35)
- October 2016 (26)
- September 2016 (13)
- August 2016 (23)
- July 2016 (22)
- June 2016 (16)
- May 2016 (21)
- April 2016 (20)
- March 2016 (27)
- February 2016 (29)
- January 2016 (23)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (30)
- October 2015 (31)
- September 2015 (29)
- August 2015 (30)
- July 2015 (70)
- June 2015 (91)
- May 2015 (93)
- April 2015 (90)
- March 2015 (93)
- February 2015 (84)
- January 2015 (83)
- December 2014 (77)
- November 2014 (86)
- October 2014 (94)
- September 2014 (89)
- August 2014 (94)
- July 2014 (93)
- June 2014 (91)
- May 2014 (93)
- April 2014 (82)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (83)
- January 2014 (97)
- December 2013 (100)
- November 2013 (122)
- October 2013 (124)
- September 2013 (120)
- August 2013 (126)
- July 2013 (124)
- June 2013 (122)
- May 2013 (124)
- April 2013 (120)
- March 2013 (117)
- February 2013 (63)
- January 2013 (96)
- December 2012 (93)
- November 2012 (92)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (91)
- August 2012 (93)
- July 2012 (93)
- June 2012 (103)
- May 2012 (93)
- April 2012 (66)
- March 2012 (65)
- February 2012 (64)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (75)
- November 2011 (75)
- October 2011 (99)
- September 2011 (60)
- August 2011 (62)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (75)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (68)
- February 2011 (62)
- January 2011 (68)
- December 2010 (64)
- November 2010 (60)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (61)
- August 2010 (66)
- July 2010 (65)
- June 2010 (61)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (60)
- March 2010 (64)
- February 2010 (46)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (26)
- November 2009 (44)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (11)
I don’t know how she could put his name on the birth certificate unless they were married. You need the persons permission and signature to do that
First things first, demand the dna test, if your hasbands name has been put on a.birth cert without his knowledge or permission thats fraud, you have to be married to the father to put his name.on without him being there, secondly why have the csa breached his protected earnings, they have left him.less than the 60% threshold, do this asap or be prepared to.be bled dry, make a.complaint regarding this and get your MP involved, good luck
Sure its not the evil workers enforcing these scandalous charges off the top of their heads. They make things up as they go along. Waste of time most of them, but I must admit there are the odd few who are good at what they do……….
You don’t have to be married but both parents must attend registering the child birth, so maybe you should ask him was he there!!?
Thought csa had to try every means of contacting the person who they intend to rob? In a case like this which may be a mistake by the csa and the victim had bank charges applied because csa left him no money to cover debts is it possible to claim back bank charges once csa admit (as if!!) their mistake?
Contact your MP asap, this will avoid months of time wasted talking with incompetent csa workers….
if 600 was taken on a wage of 698 then this can not be true surely? 40% is the maximum they can take, he needs to see his employer. have you not asked the csa the questions you ask here? it does not add up but if is true then there is a huge error and you need to call them asap.
It good to see the csa are doing the job they are being paid to do. If thy are just leaving him with £98 that’s because he is on CSA 1 and has a IMA and a low protected income. So that means for he last 10 years least he has avoided the csa even the hardcore Deadbeats on here would agree he should have paid something.
Can I ask all Pwc to send the csa a letter of support they see a success storey like his
At sue….read the post properly, he might not be the father and leaving other children in poverty. Why should children be treated differently financially just because one was born before the other?