Advice: can someone be named the father without proof?
In order to be a named parent, the person in care of the child will need to bring evidence that you are the real father of the child.
Either by having your name on birth certificate (you cannot register a father’s name without being married or without his consent) -accredited DNA testing -court order.
After mother bringing evidence(DNA, birth certificate re-registered etc) then the mother will have to re-claim , but having you on csa will give you rights as you can go to court and claim custody.
If you are not named on the birth certificate, she will have to take a court order to make you give a DNA sample.
All this process can last for about a year.
If she is someone little hungry for money, but not allowing you to be in you childs life, you can make a claim and get a court order. Most of this woman , just want a bit of extra cash, using this as a weapon against man for their crashed relationships.
I am a wife and my husband has a stupid claim from his ex-girlfriend.
It looks like now she can’t put her paws on our money as if she goes to court she will have to pay for the paternity test 250 pounds.
Top of that it looks like she’s been preganant 11 months:) So my suggestion , deny paternity , don’t pay a penny, and let her drag you to court to get a dna testing.
CSA will force you to take DNA testing, only if you are named on birth certificate ,there is a court order or you have been married at the time of conception.
I hope this will discourage the gold diggers.
14 thoughts on “Advice: can someone be named the father without proof?”
Leave a Reply
I think you have your facts a little wrong here. If he is the father and is denying paternity in order to not pay, he will have to prove he is NOT the father. The CSA go with the mother and the father does not have to be named on the birth certificate at all. The responsibility is down to to him to prove he’s not, she has no proving to do I’m afraid.
AND even if you are paying CSa it does not give you rights to custody? so from reading your post it seems that women wanting the fathers to pay for their children are ‘gold diggers’? You sound like a lovely person….
Think some men need to get a fucking grip! Did us women make children our self?
Emma I agree but why do fathers get raped if the child is with mother and on benefits the child is paid for by government and tax payers so why rape the father
Why point all financial responsibility at the Fathers? I’ve got an ideas…….what if both parents were responsible financially for their child??? Keith Forshaw I could of put money on that you are from Liverpool with that attitude!
Oh no. You can only name the real father. Dont go down that street. Make sure you know the right man you went with. It might be hard for you to think about it but dont fook someones life up just coz you want money off the csa. Make sure you pick the right father coz he can have a dna test and take you to court for stress. And damages. And costs.
Plus. Y you the csa when the father can help you and or you kid or kids out. The only way is money off the father without the csa. The csa turns kids against the fathers. Trust me. You dont want to use the csa scum. Find out the father and make sure you kids have and keep in contact. Dont have the kids to lose a father just coz the csa want you to use them. Nobody should use the csa.
RT @CSAHell: Advice: can someone be named the father without proof?: In order to be a named parent, the person in car… http://t.co/srK782…
Who is pointing ALL financial responsibility onto the father?? from what I see most men on this page want to not pay at all….think that’s shifting the financial responsibility onot the mum!!! Disgraceful. You all stick up for the poor woe is me fathers who father children and fuck off without supporting them but when a mum needs help raising her child from the so called father you all moan about it.
Emma I totally agree but what some people seem to forget on here is that benefits or not the child is still the fathers responsibility to support the upbringing!!!
A women CAN claim with out DNA prof. All she has to say to them is so and so is the dad then he can say no i’m not and CSA will make him do a DNA . If he then say no to CSA asking for DNA they just take the money from him anyway until HE prov otherwise & if he is he has to pay if he not she has to pay . NOT every dad has the money to take the ex to court when she want the play games . The rules need to charge to help dads not get messed over by women like that to many kids miss out over selfish women that have NO respected for their kids if they did the father would have to go to court to see them she would let him with no fight .
Some these women have no idea how easier they have it thinking cos they have the kids and claim all these money & don’t work their life is hard . Try being the part the 2rd family when someone paying out to CSA then u know what hard is having no money no matter what you do to live as all go to the 1st women . Yes both mum and dad should help but not to point were the 2rd family cant even put food on the table or keep the ecli on
o AND they do not need to be on the b,c do not have to have been marred to them and she dose not need a court order . If he is the dad your about to come down to earth with a big ass bump
go the some for some working mum NOT ALL BTW ( ON ABOUT LAZY ONE THAT CANT DO WANT BEST FOR THEIR KIDS AND PLAY THE FEEL SORRY FOR ME CARD )
Sorry , at the beginning I got the information wrong.
If you want have a look on the gov uk. disputed paternity.
Reply to Tracy: no not all the women are gold diggers, just the ones that decide that by having a baby they can claim a bit of extra cash from either the government, ONG,or fathers.
His case: the lovely lady put his name on the birth certificate by claiming she was married(she was not).GRO told us that yes she can do that and they will not take any action against her.
Reply to Emma: both are responsible for the conception of a child, unfortunately the decision of (in order): taking the pill, announcing the pregnancy, taking the decision of keeping the child or not, stays with the woman.So if a man is stupid enough to even leave a condom behind , he can get screwed for next 25 years.
Unfortunately what this kind of women do not understand is that a child needs both a mother and a father and in his situation , just the fact that maybe he was a sperm donor , will never bring him close to that child.Why? It is always going to be a reminder of the fact that the mother tried to keep the relationship by having the child and claiming it is his child.
It is going to be a reminder of something he did not want in his life, meaning the mother.
I already spoke with him about how he feels about the possibility and he hates the idea of being tricked like this, therefore he hates the child and the child suffers the consequences of his/hers mother’s action.(unfortunately)
He wants no contact , he does not even want to call to speak with her, the only contact is made either via CSA or solicitors.
Gee I am wondering why ?