We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To be fair it’s not the council. It’s the goverment that imposes the rules. I assume your talking about a room for your child. Under the new rules if a room isn’t being occupied then the council will impose what we call the bedroom tax. However to be classed as a room for sleeping it needs to be more than 9ft x 7ft. Anything less than this and it can’t be classed as a bedroom for sleeping. Also all you would need is a document from either from the pwc or the csa stating that you have the child x number of nights. It makes
Me sick to say this but social services would be able to help you further. Hope this helps and good
Luck
It’s not just the CSA, it’s the council as well June 2, 2013
Hello all, I refer to Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998. THE RIGHT TO A PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE. Councils maybe obliged to provide housing where families are concerned.
The HRA 1998 is becoming more and more segmented to destroy such rights. If the Councils claim they cannot accommodate you and your children which are “legally” yours under Article 1, Protocol 1 ( Possession) then the United Kingdom Government as a whole could be held liable for violating such Articles of the HRA 1998.
May I also make a point to the same government that if parents are accused of abusing their children “emotionally”, by shouting at them, then the same government may also be liable for “emotionally disturbing” any child and in doing so are in fact torturing a child which too is also found in the Human Rights Act under Torture. It could be deemed as “mental torture” for a child not to see his ;or her parents if either parent wishes to see their child ;or vice versa and under the HRA 1998,
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/human-rights/human-rights/the-human-rights-act/what-the-rights-mean/article-3-no-torture-inhuman-or-degrading-treatment.php
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/human-rights/human-rights/the-human-rights-act/what-the-rights-mean/article-3-no-torture-inhuman-or-degrading-treatment.php
IF the HRA still exists in the UK, then no one shall be Tortured whether physically ;or MENTALLY. Whether Male or Female. A child is not strong enough mentally ;or physically to be “tortured” by not being allowed to see his /her parents and I must remind the UK Government of Article 7 of the same Act “NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW” The UK Government are in FACT “PUNISHING CHILDREN by not allowing them to see their natural parents and thus are TORTURING the children and the parents from seeing each other. If the UK Government cares to observe the HRA 1998, and take notice of “in between the lines” then parents would see and read that I am talking sense and applying the HUMAN RIGHTS Act !