Some questions I’d like Parliament and the Families Minister to address

June 15, 2015

Hi, I’ve written before, but in summary my ex-partner chucked me out of the family home I’d bought and has obstructed all orders for contact since 2009. She went to the CSA despite having got the house, £26,000 of my savings and failed to pay court costs awarded against her. The CSA made a DEO based on my then job and that cost me about £7500 and since I was made redundant she has now got them to snatch £20,000 of my pension. The financial claims are never ending. I have appealed to the Upper Tier Tribunal against the actions of the CSA especially given the obstruction of contact, only to receive a letter saying that it is ‘not in the interests of justice to allow my appeal’ !!!! Justice for who ? Do they know what justice is ? I am going to see my MP soon (I know I wont get far) i may then write to Judge Munby. What I’d like Parliament and the Families Minister to address is as follows:-

1. Why can a mother (PWC) ignore and obstruct multiple court orders for contact without any sanction being applied ?
2. Why is there no link between the Family Court and the CSA in that where a PWC obstructs contact it makes no difference to the actions of the CSA
3. Why cannot benefit payments be reduced or removed until a PWC cooperates with orders from the Family Court in the same way that the CSA applies Enforcement Orders without acknowledging any of the actions and orders of the Family Court or the Father’s (NRP) situation and argument in the Family Court
4. Why is the CSA permitted to secretly investigate an NRP and block his bank accounts without these actions being assessed in an open Court
5. Do we live in a secret police state
6. Why doesn’t the CSA make an assessment of the relative assets of the parties before making calculations about how much income to deduct from the NRP.
7. Why doesn’t the CSA have to reach a financial conclusion and draft a financial settlement agreement between the parties (like in a divorce) which cannot be revisited and changed (increased) on subsequent representations from the PWC (lifestyle inconsistent with income)
8. Why isn’t such a financial agreement linked to a contact order and where contact is obstructed why doesn’t the PWC forfeit payments from the CSA, Child Benefit, Other Family Benefits and the NRP.
9. Why is it not in the interests of justice for an NRP to raise these questions

We must get the law changed and a clear link between money and contact.

Rant over
David

Comments

  • John says:

    I was in the same boat. screwed by the incompetent grade 1 clerks at the CSA, who made it up as they went along.

    Be careful when you see your M.P. mine initially helped and then back stabbed me. The CSA and Politicians are as thick as thieves. The CSA have stakeholders. M.P.’s are some of them.

    Ask your M.P. to involve the Ombudsman on the grounds of prolonged and continued maladministration of your case. I went to the Ombudsman but my strong case for maladministration was whitewashed to suit themselves. Like I said they’re as thick as thieves.

    Under Common law, everyone has the right to be tried by a jury of their peers. Not so with this crap system, they use the debtors prison system on decent, honest people who only want what is fair and just.

    There will eventually be a class action against the government, and the scum at the CSA. keep all your documents, in order to prove their incompetence and ask for damages when that happens.

    With regard to contact. The courts do nothing and the CSA don’t care. That has cost two children their inheritance from me!

    Good luck.

  • >