We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I completely understand! My ex gets £2700 in benefits and my payments! That’s a £ 42,000 a year job! How can this ever be right?????
u can only get £500 a week in benefits now . that inc rent and c,t benefits . but yeah i know what u main my son dad had to give up his job cos we could feed the son we have together on top the CSA .
Maria Zonfrillo liked this on Facebook.
The £500 cap is if you don’t work at all. If you work 16hrs you are exempt. That’s how it was explained on Panorama Don’t cap my benefits’ programme.
I agree it sucks. If they have the parent paying regularly like my partner has done for 11 years then why should they get child tax credits ect. I mean how many people are paying for the children (absent parent, tax payer for benefits, which means the working parent are paying twice) then you have the parent with care and no doubt any partner that they have bagged. All this and their are still children in poverty. It’s a joke!!!
Cos there is no justice!
What makes you sick is they drum in that your child will be In poverty if you don’t pay,well if you pay what they ask and I’m sure we all know they close there eyes tap a few keys on a calculator and hey presto your sum you have to pay is resolved,you will put yourself Into poverty thus not being able to feed yourself and see work as not the right choice, this case highlights massively that this countries benefit system is trying to eliminate child poverty anyway, I’m all for a fair system of a sliding scale payments to make it clearer of say 50 for one child ten each child will after that will be slightly less, the mother still revives her benefits dads get a fair crack of being able to pay and all this % crap stops and saves the stress! ( I’ve plucked the 50 figure out the air as an example)