We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalised ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I don’t think csa take the private agreement into account which is probably why you are paying out more. You can open up your own case but I would let your ex know you’re doing this. If you have your child overnight let the csa know this as this also reflects payments. In the long run csa is becoming maintenance direct, this is where parents mediate a way forward, if both parties cannot agree and still use the agency there will be a percentage taken from both pwc and nrp.
yes they take the money in one and slit between both off them . if ur on a PA with one CSA should be told and taken in to a count on payments
i’ve just gone through this. I have two kids to separate mothers and sadly after 12 years of seeing my eldest they stopped me seeing her as they’d got a windfall and could at last actually afford to tell me to jog on. At that point I was on a private arrangement with them. 12 months later they now want the money and reported me to the CSA.
THe CSA wouldn’t recognise my private arrangement with my youngest so I was due to pay 15% to eldest, when it should really be 20% for both kids split 10% each mother.
My youngest’s mum rang the CSA too and reported me and it then meant that they’d get a fair 50/50 split and I pay one through CSA and one direct. It’s a total farce that this pathetic organisation is attempting to get parents to agree maintenance plans but in turn don’t recognise them when you do.
You are also entitled to reduce the maintenance of your child you see by 2/7th’s of your maintenance for overnight visits.