Ex went to the CSA after I paid her direct
January 3, 2013
I have 7 and 8 year old boys that live in exeter (i stay in dundee) having sent money to the ex she has now went to csa. After contacting them.they decided i owed her 3500 in arrears.i offered to pay £300 per month which they point blank refused i then offered £350 still refused after sometime arguing on what i can afford and that i have a 5mth old daughter to my new gilfriend to which they replied its not our problem if you cannot pay a considerable amount in the line of our 40%of your wages then we have no alternative to proceed with 40%of your wages.
My partner have found that we can no longer afford to pay bills(partner has just been payed of)the csa really dont care what happens to anybodys finnacial state how about helping the non resident to the kids(me the father) out (i dont get to see them as she wont let me)i have bills to pay like everyother person. sickening
Written by garry aberdein · Filed Under CSA Help
Related CSA Posts
Comments
Tell us your CSA story
Do you want to be heard?
Tell us your story of how the CSA has treated you. We might be able to help, and could publish your tale on the website to make sure everyone knows about the problems you've had.
Forum Login
Child Support Agency Poll
Loading ...CSAhell.com on Facebook
Search CSAhell.com
Child Support Agency (CSA) Advice
CSAhell.com has been set up to help you with your child support agency problems. If you're having difficulty getting the CSA to listen you can tell your story here. Get advice on dealing with the CSA at CSAhell.com.Subscribe
Enter your email address to receive child support agency advice and news direct to your inbox.
Recent Forum Replies
Recent Forum Topics
-
what impact of media for children
by aliceshaun
5 years, 10 months ago
-
csa arrears after case closed confused?
by jimgsd
6 years, 6 months ago
-
Pay Your Way – Avoid The CSA
by arealman
7 years ago
-
Can the CSA find me?
by amc123
7 years, 3 months ago
-
CSA to CMS
by markburtonmark
7 years, 7 months ago
-
what impact of media for children
by aliceshaun
-
Recent Posts
Categories
- Child Support Agency (112)
- CSA Advice (2,239)
- CSA Complaints (3,218)
- CSA Help (1,019)
- CSA Mistakes (392)
- CSA News (148)
- Events & Protests (8)
- General (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Website Updates (9)
CSA Comments
- Jayne on HMRC confirmed my ex’s lies to CSA
- Clair on CSA Self Employed
- Dontbeajudge on My ex won’t even give money for birthday presents
- kostakis Kleanthous on What is the maximum amount the CSA can take from me?
- Dave on My ex is lying to the CSA – what can I do?
- Ts on Will the CSA take my new partner’s earnings into account?
- Kate on How to beat the CSA
- unfair on How to beat the CSA
CSA Websites
-
Popular CSA posts today
- Do the CSA have to leave... 11 views | 0 comments
- Can child maintenance dis... 9 views | 0 comments
- Not allowed to see my Kid... 9 views | 0 comments
- Child Support Solutions 8 views | 0 comments
- Child left college but CS... 8 views | 0 comments
- Ex works cash in hand so... 8 views | 0 comments
- What will the CSA do if y... 7 views | 0 comments
- How can I reopen my case... 7 views | 0 comments
- CSA payments for child on... 7 views | 0 comments
- How do the CSA know if I&... 7 views | 0 comments
Archives
- February 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (7)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (6)
- February 2018 (32)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (20)
- October 2017 (15)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (19)
- May 2017 (20)
- April 2017 (16)
- March 2017 (19)
- February 2017 (14)
- January 2017 (15)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (35)
- October 2016 (26)
- September 2016 (13)
- August 2016 (23)
- July 2016 (22)
- June 2016 (16)
- May 2016 (21)
- April 2016 (20)
- March 2016 (27)
- February 2016 (29)
- January 2016 (23)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (30)
- October 2015 (31)
- September 2015 (29)
- August 2015 (30)
- July 2015 (70)
- June 2015 (91)
- May 2015 (93)
- April 2015 (90)
- March 2015 (93)
- February 2015 (84)
- January 2015 (83)
- December 2014 (77)
- November 2014 (86)
- October 2014 (94)
- September 2014 (89)
- August 2014 (94)
- July 2014 (93)
- June 2014 (91)
- May 2014 (93)
- April 2014 (82)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (83)
- January 2014 (97)
- December 2013 (100)
- November 2013 (122)
- October 2013 (124)
- September 2013 (120)
- August 2013 (126)
- July 2013 (124)
- June 2013 (122)
- May 2013 (124)
- April 2013 (120)
- March 2013 (117)
- February 2013 (63)
- January 2013 (96)
- December 2012 (93)
- November 2012 (92)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (91)
- August 2012 (93)
- July 2012 (93)
- June 2012 (103)
- May 2012 (93)
- April 2012 (66)
- March 2012 (65)
- February 2012 (64)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (75)
- November 2011 (75)
- October 2011 (99)
- September 2011 (60)
- August 2011 (62)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (75)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (68)
- February 2011 (62)
- January 2011 (68)
- December 2010 (64)
- November 2010 (60)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (61)
- August 2010 (66)
- July 2010 (65)
- June 2010 (61)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (60)
- March 2010 (64)
- February 2010 (46)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (26)
- November 2009 (44)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (11)
Just another example of what a bunch of “couldn’t give a shit” c***ts the csa is and how unfair it is that the mother can claim whatever she fucking wishes for and these assholes believe her and start bleeding the NRP dry despite him having his own life to live and family to support.
It’s beyond unbelievable how they treat NRP’s and very scary.the csa is a NRP’s worst nightmare…they are a horror story like no other
when was the case opened and have you paid your ex direct after this date?
If payments were made direct to your ex since the case was opened and you have informed them of the payments they should contact your ex partner and ask her to confirm she has received payments direct from you for child maintenance, the arrears can then be adjusted accordingly. If she states no money was rec’d you can submit evidence that it was – ie bank statements as I presume given the distance between you and your ex that you are paying by standing order or such like. If your ex confirms that she has rec’d money but claims it is for something other than CM then you will be held liable for the arrears.
What is your current regular maintenance?
Did you inform the agency when your baby daughter was born? You are entitled to a 15% allowance for a child living in your household. If you have not informed them then you need to do this asap and ask for a new MC to include the ROC (relevant Other child) allowance. They will need to check that Child Benefit is in payment so you will need to supply the name of the person who claims this (usually the mother) and if possible her NI no
This is what’s soooo wrong and unfair about this agency…it believes anything the PWC tells them. Alice…you said yourself that if the mother claims its for something other than CM……they just believe her and therefore he’s liable to pay ….it’s utter crap that NRP’s can be treated like this. It’s staggering that they are allowed to get away with it.As I said before…the only logical reason they let this happen is because the PWC is the client and bringing in the bacon for the treasury,if the PWC can lie in order to bring in even more bacon for the treasury, then why would they rock the boat by asking her to prove anything…..it’s fucking unbieveable….what a scam this is
Yes Gonk,that is exactly position were in ! having to pay everything again just because the pwc says its for the mortgage (of course she knew it wasn’t !!) Anyway nrp doesn’t have to pay both CM & maintenance. We have to pay thousands all over again.I think it’s too biased towards believing the pwc to make the collection figures look better that can be the only reason .The csa said its no concern of theirs that we cant afford any quality of life for the child that lives with us.We do our best like you do , but it’s a real struggle.