Comments on: I’m in financial difficulty due to the CSA http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html Child Support Agency Advice and Complaints Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: jeff http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-2984 jeff Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:43:14 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-2984 Very sad folks.Maybe if you answered people posts for genuine help with as much vigour as you do slagging each other off then we would all be enlightened to the way forward......................... We live in a country that thrives on divide and rule Very sad folks.Maybe if you answered people posts for genuine help with as much vigour as you do slagging each other off then we would all be enlightened to the way forward…………………….
We live in a country that thrives on divide and rule

]]> By: Marque http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-808 Marque Thu, 21 May 2009 23:30:26 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-808 Chall Cancel the last msg, I got in. Will catch up with you soon. Chall
Cancel the last msg, I got in.
Will catch up with you soon.

]]> By: Marque http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-807 Marque Thu, 21 May 2009 22:25:49 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-807 Nice to hear from you chall, but, as your website wont let me in, I cant contact you, so much for that way forward, tried the forgotten password bit, my name and email addy are registered but not to me it would seem. Not to worry, i will keep on battling with the jolly CSA on me own. thanks anyway. Nice to hear from you chall, but, as your website wont let me in, I cant contact you, so much for that way forward, tried the forgotten password bit, my name and email addy are registered but not to me it would seem.
Not to worry, i will keep on battling with the jolly CSA on me own.
thanks anyway.

]]> By: chall http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-801 chall Thu, 21 May 2009 11:02:31 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-801 Hi marque, I have searched our email and our forum, and I am unable to find any questions pertaining to a case, as described above, which have received no response - so I'm not too sure what has happened there... But offer my apologises anyway. Having read your post, I am sure you can appreciate, that in order to offer advice on your case, we will require more detailed information from you. You are more than welcome to either email via the contact us facility at http://afairercsaforall.co.uk/ OR join us in the forum. Hi marque,

I have searched our email and our forum, and I am unable to find any questions pertaining to a case, as described above, which have received no response – so I’m not too sure what has happened there… But offer my apologises anyway.

Having read your post, I am sure you can appreciate, that in order to offer advice on your case, we will require more detailed information from you.

You are more than welcome to either email via the contact us facility at http://afairercsaforall.co.uk/ OR join us in the forum.

]]> By: Marque http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-798 Marque Mon, 18 May 2009 21:40:58 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-798 Dear All I started to read this thread and initially found it quite interesting, until...................... I got round to reading who is better than who!!!!! I have looked at both sites recently ( due to my own misfortunes with the CSA ) deadbeatdads and a fairercsaforall, both have some interesting points to make, one site very up front and seemingly forcefull, the other not quite so in their approach, as to who is right and who is wrong, which is 'better than the other', the wheres and whyfores are of no interest to me. Yes I believe that folk are quite capable of making their own minds up as to who they which to be associated with, wether there be a cost involved or not, I have personally spoken to dead beats, didn't really take the advice offered but thanks anyway, I have also left comments on the AFCSAFA site, no reply as yet, such is life. The bottom line surely should be, WE ARE ALL AWARE OF THE PROBLEMS FACED BY NRP's AND PWC's so lets get it sorted!!! My own reason for being on here today, well I went to Court today, for the 2nd time over the dubious Liabilty Order, my summons was for one figure yet the CSA found Court favour even though they gave a totally new figure differing from the Court paperwork, my question is, has anyone else had this happe? I also have another Court date for a different Court ( same case ) with guess what............................yep different figures again. So any suggestions?? I have already sent a letter to my MP asking for a meeting, he did quite well last time he was involved. My case first started in 2001, just in case anybody wanted to know, apart from the Court issue I also have yet another Tribunal to attend in June as I have been accused of living beyond my income, makes a change from fraud which was the last tribunal attended. the rest of the case has been the usual assessment after assessment blah blah blah. Hope some one reads this and I also hope that thewarring factions either simply agree to disagree or just get on with the topic that inspired both to set up their websites in the first place. Thanks marque p.s no I do not belong to DBD or AFCSAFA, and have also been a PWC and am now a NRP. Dear All
I started to read this thread and initially found it quite interesting, until………………….
I got round to reading who is better than who!!!!! I have looked at both sites recently ( due to my own misfortunes with the CSA ) deadbeatdads and a fairercsaforall, both have some interesting points to make, one site very up front and seemingly forcefull, the other not quite so in their approach, as to who is right and who is wrong, which is ‘better than the other’, the wheres and whyfores are of no interest to me.
Yes I believe that folk are quite capable of making their own minds up as to who they which to be associated with, wether there be a cost involved or not, I have personally spoken to dead beats, didn’t really take the advice offered but thanks anyway, I have also left comments on the AFCSAFA site, no reply as yet, such is life.
The bottom line surely should be, WE ARE ALL AWARE OF THE PROBLEMS FACED BY NRP’s AND PWC’s so lets get it sorted!!!
My own reason for being on here today, well I went to Court today, for the 2nd time over the dubious Liabilty Order, my summons was for one figure yet the CSA found Court favour even though they gave a totally new figure differing from the Court paperwork, my question is, has anyone else had this happe?
I also have another Court date for a different Court ( same case ) with guess what……………………….yep different figures again.
So any suggestions??
I have already sent a letter to my MP asking for a meeting, he did quite well last time he was involved.
My case first started in 2001, just in case anybody wanted to know, apart from the Court issue I also have yet another Tribunal to attend in June as I have been accused of living beyond my income, makes a change from fraud which was the last tribunal attended.
the rest of the case has been the usual assessment after assessment blah blah blah.
Hope some one reads this and I also hope that thewarring factions either simply agree to disagree or just get on with the topic that inspired both to set up their websites in the first place.
Thanks
marque
p.s no I do not belong to DBD or AFCSAFA, and have also been a PWC and am now a NRP.

]]> By: chall http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-791 chall Fri, 08 May 2009 23:11:20 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-791 The following link has been drawn to our attention ... http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/Decision/i133/Hossak.pdf (dated 18.12.07) Interesting reading, considering the unfounded accusations that have been made by the parties concerned, especially the continued use of the word 'vexatious', and comments such as; 'scattering his allegations of corruption broadly', 'aggressive, threatening and abusive', 'Appellant’s purpose was to argue and even harangue', 'deluded sense of the importance of the issues at stake.', 'he makes an unpleasant and personal attack on the conduct and integrity of the solicitor conducting the case..' Its goes on to say.. 'In our view, far from a campaigner for truth and justice on behalf of the public, as Mr ******* portrays himself, he is more correctly described as pursuing an unreasonable obsession.' The following link has been drawn to our attention …
http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/Decision/i133/Hossak.pdf (dated 18.12.07)
Interesting reading, considering the unfounded accusations that have been made by the parties concerned, especially the continued use of the word ‘vexatious’, and comments such as;

‘scattering his allegations of corruption broadly’,
‘aggressive, threatening and abusive’,
‘Appellant’s purpose was to argue and even harangue’,
‘deluded sense of the importance of the issues at stake.’,
‘he makes an unpleasant and personal attack on the conduct and integrity of the solicitor conducting the case..’

Its goes on to say..
‘In our view, far from a campaigner for truth and justice on
behalf of the public, as Mr ******* portrays himself, he is more correctly described
as pursuing an unreasonable obsession.’

]]> By: Alison Karahan http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-761 Alison Karahan Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:48:16 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-761 I have a problem that is not mentioned in any of the above comments. I have a problem that is not mentioned in any of the above comments.

]]> By: deadbeatdad/dwpcorruption http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-750 deadbeatdad/dwpcorruption Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:45:47 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-750 DTB " you have the right to remain silent" ,,,,,,,,, " no comment " always goes down well. DTB ” you have the right to remain silent” ,,,,,,,,, ” no comment ” always goes down well.

]]> By: DTB http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-749 DTB Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:52:14 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-749 @ deadbeatdad, these childish 'No comments' seem nothing more than pieces of bait to get peoples backs up. Again looking through this thread I would be astonished that anyone would take you seriously! I also suspect those from the Government keeping an eye on the online groups will be sitting with a wry grin on their faces reading through it! There is more chance of getting the smoking ban lifted than getting anywhere with the CSA when behaviour like this is occurring!!!!!!!!! @ deadbeatdad, these childish ‘No comments’ seem nothing more than pieces of bait to get peoples backs up. Again looking through this thread I would be astonished that anyone would take you seriously! I also suspect those from the Government keeping an eye on the online groups will be sitting with a wry grin on their faces reading through it! There is more chance of getting the smoking ban lifted than getting anywhere with the CSA when behaviour like this is occurring!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: deadbeatdad/dwpcorruption http://www.csahell.com/im-in-financial-difficulty-due-to-the-csa-141.html/comment-page-2#comment-748 deadbeatdad/dwpcorruption Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:30:36 +0000 http://www.csahell.com/?p=141#comment-748 We at DWPCorruption and DBDA reserve the right to comment upon a fairercsaforall argument as we believe AFCSAFA do not have the intelectual background or the necessary argument to fit the criteria of receiving any help or advice from both DWPCorruption and Dead Beat Dads, we fully understand how frustrating it is for AFCSAFA havin ght enecessary qualities to fight the Government bodies. With regards to evidence to DWPCorruption and DBDA this can be challenged and fully endorsed at any persons wish. We at DWPCorruption and DBDA reserve the right to comment upon a fairercsaforall argument as we believe AFCSAFA do not have the intelectual background or the necessary argument to fit the criteria of receiving any help or advice from both DWPCorruption and Dead Beat Dads, we fully understand how frustrating it is for AFCSAFA havin ght enecessary qualities to fight the Government bodies. With regards to evidence to DWPCorruption and DBDA this can be challenged and fully endorsed at any persons wish.

]]>