You clearly didn't bring into the home the same amount that was demanded from your ex husband. Many women have to work full-time when they would far sooner be at home with their children, unfortunately its not the 50's and 60's. You mention in an earlier post that when couples split up their children should be brought up in the manner to which they have been accustomed, again that very rarely happens, 2 homes can not be maintained to the same standard as 1. Does it really matter, if children do not have exactly the same as they do when part of a 2 parent family, perhaps its a good lesson in life. We have become a nation of "people having everything", nice house, 2 cars, 3 holidays, X box, Wii, 3D TV, Designer Clothes, Leisure luxuries galore, when really all children need is clothing, feeding, a clean warm house to live in and the love of BOTH PARENTS regardless of whether they are together or not.
You mention you directed your son to the CSA website, I'm sure you didn't mean this one, my goodness his eyes would have been opened to the plight of NRP invariably men. The way they are persecuted, and branded as worse than drink drivers by David Cameron.
Children do not need half of a man's wage to support them, they certainly do not need any part of the wage of the "New Woman". If your ex has houses that she rents out that quite frankly is her business and her business alone. She is obviously a successful savvy business woman and has used to CSA rules to hers and your ex's advantage, good luck to her. Why should the "Any New Woman" support other women and their children, why should the "Any New Woman's" Tax Credits be considered in the CSA assessment, that is for her children.
Another point you make is that its non of the NRP's business as to what the PWC spends the money on ......... I can assure you it is. Like the first poster on this thread, we too have experienced over £400 a month going to a woman who does not spend it on her child. We have had to put up with seeing a child age 9 in tatty aged 2-3 knickers, odd shoes, stinking of cigarette smoke (note: these women always seem to smoke ), shoes with holes in and I mean big holes where you can see straight through, dirty clothes, clothes that are too small, crisp sandwiches for tea or the child is sick on the 80 mile journey to our home due to hunger, oddly enough she is never sick on the way back. So to say it is not our business is disgraceful.
The CSA is designed to help bitter jealous women can get their own back on their ex if the ex left them. They can further down the line get revenge on the ex if he is lucky enough to find a decent woman and have a far superior happier life than them. It is also designed so that the government can rip off men who have a DOE landed on them, they can take as much money as they like in fictious arrears to make up for the shortfall. If you child drops out of college or goes to university, it doesn't matter you have to keep paying even though their website says you dont, its just all a big government scam. If a woman is a lazy Jeremy Kyle watching scrubber than the world is their oyster.....................
