Ex has made fraudulent claims and lied to CSA
January 19, 2013
I have contacted the CSA to advise them that my payments to my oldest child should have stopped in September as he is now in Higher education (HND), They had arrested my wages because my ex had told them I had not been paying this was a complete lie as every month on my payday I would put money into her Bank, The CSA tell me that the arrears I have is for 2010 to 2012 but this is based on a lie as I was paying every month without fail.
As i was paying the money direct into her bank I only have a few stubs as proof. They told me they would have to have this confirmed by her. I feel cheated as the CSA told me that yes the payment should have been reduced for my oldest but the arrestment must stay in place until after their investigation. My ex has made fraudulent claims against me and lied to the CSA as well as withhold information about my oldest’s education.
I need to know what I can do as speaking to the CSA is a waste of time. Help!
Written by Brian Murray · Filed Under CSA Complaints
Related CSA Posts
Comments
Tell us your CSA story
Do you want to be heard?
Tell us your story of how the CSA has treated you. We might be able to help, and could publish your tale on the website to make sure everyone knows about the problems you've had.
Forum Login
Child Support Agency Poll
Loading ...CSAhell.com on Facebook
Search CSAhell.com
Child Support Agency (CSA) Advice
CSAhell.com has been set up to help you with your child support agency problems. If you're having difficulty getting the CSA to listen you can tell your story here. Get advice on dealing with the CSA at CSAhell.com.Subscribe
Enter your email address to receive child support agency advice and news direct to your inbox.
Recent Forum Replies
Recent Forum Topics
-
what impact of media for children
by aliceshaun
5 years, 10 months ago
-
csa arrears after case closed confused?
by jimgsd
6 years, 6 months ago
-
Pay Your Way – Avoid The CSA
by arealman
7 years ago
-
Can the CSA find me?
by amc123
7 years, 3 months ago
-
CSA to CMS
by markburtonmark
7 years, 7 months ago
-
what impact of media for children
by aliceshaun
-
Recent Posts
Categories
- Child Support Agency (112)
- CSA Advice (2,239)
- CSA Complaints (3,218)
- CSA Help (1,019)
- CSA Mistakes (392)
- CSA News (148)
- Events & Protests (8)
- General (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Website Updates (9)
CSA Comments
- Jayne on HMRC confirmed my ex’s lies to CSA
- Clair on CSA Self Employed
- Dontbeajudge on My ex won’t even give money for birthday presents
- kostakis Kleanthous on What is the maximum amount the CSA can take from me?
- Dave on My ex is lying to the CSA – what can I do?
- Ts on Will the CSA take my new partner’s earnings into account?
- Kate on How to beat the CSA
- unfair on How to beat the CSA
CSA Websites
-
Popular CSA posts today
- Can child maintenance dis... 9 views | 0 comments
- Do the CSA have to leave... 9 views | 0 comments
- Not allowed to see my Kid... 9 views | 0 comments
- What will the CSA do if y... 8 views | 0 comments
- Child Support Solutions 8 views | 0 comments
- Child left college but CS... 8 views | 0 comments
- Ex works cash in hand so... 7 views | 0 comments
- CSA payments for child on... 7 views | 0 comments
- How can I reopen my case... 7 views | 0 comments
- Partner’s ex lies a... 6 views | 0 comments
Archives
- February 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (7)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (6)
- February 2018 (32)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (20)
- October 2017 (15)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (19)
- May 2017 (20)
- April 2017 (16)
- March 2017 (19)
- February 2017 (14)
- January 2017 (15)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (35)
- October 2016 (26)
- September 2016 (13)
- August 2016 (23)
- July 2016 (22)
- June 2016 (16)
- May 2016 (21)
- April 2016 (20)
- March 2016 (27)
- February 2016 (29)
- January 2016 (23)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (30)
- October 2015 (31)
- September 2015 (29)
- August 2015 (30)
- July 2015 (70)
- June 2015 (91)
- May 2015 (93)
- April 2015 (90)
- March 2015 (93)
- February 2015 (84)
- January 2015 (83)
- December 2014 (77)
- November 2014 (86)
- October 2014 (94)
- September 2014 (89)
- August 2014 (94)
- July 2014 (93)
- June 2014 (91)
- May 2014 (93)
- April 2014 (82)
- March 2014 (83)
- February 2014 (83)
- January 2014 (97)
- December 2013 (100)
- November 2013 (122)
- October 2013 (124)
- September 2013 (120)
- August 2013 (126)
- July 2013 (124)
- June 2013 (122)
- May 2013 (124)
- April 2013 (120)
- March 2013 (117)
- February 2013 (63)
- January 2013 (96)
- December 2012 (93)
- November 2012 (92)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (91)
- August 2012 (93)
- July 2012 (93)
- June 2012 (103)
- May 2012 (93)
- April 2012 (66)
- March 2012 (65)
- February 2012 (64)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (75)
- November 2011 (75)
- October 2011 (99)
- September 2011 (60)
- August 2011 (62)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (75)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (68)
- February 2011 (62)
- January 2011 (68)
- December 2010 (64)
- November 2010 (60)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (61)
- August 2010 (66)
- July 2010 (65)
- June 2010 (61)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (60)
- March 2010 (64)
- February 2010 (46)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (26)
- November 2009 (44)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (11)
if your case was set so that you were meant to pay the CSA and they then paid out the money to the PWC their system will not see the payments you have made direct, as such either the PWC has to confirm receipt of direct payments or you will have to provide proof that the payments were made, if you are unable to provide proof the agency will seek to collect the full arrears from yourself.
In respect of the fact that your eldest is in advanced education, if the PWC has not informed the Child Benefit office she is claiming this fraudulently, CHB being in payment allows the csa case to remain open. The agency will contact your ex in the first instance and ask if the QC is in advanced education, if she confirms this then the case will be re-assessed as per the appropriate date. If you ex does not confirm this then you will need to report the matter to the CHB office and ask them to investigate it further.
Let me just see if I have understood you correctly Alice as your final sentence is rather disturbing.
PWC confirms QC now in higher education = re-assessment. PWC denies QC now in higher education and it becomes the responsibility of the NRP to report the matter?
In other words by informing the CSA/CMEC/CMA/Vertex/Serco that a criminal act is taking place i.e. fraud, one can then expect a blind eye to be turned thereby condoning this alleged illegal activity!! I find it incredible that an entire government agency can absolve itself from reporting this form of wrongdoing. Surely to god there must be a system of information sharing between departments rather than just putting the onus back onto a member of the public who has effectively already reported the matter!
Scandalous to say the very least.
@ Gamecock – don’t expect a decent response from Alice as she/he only replies with CSA rules and dictats what ‘should’ happen.
I have made suggestions on how CSA staff could deal with situations to avoid so much upset but Alice has chosen to ignore my posts lol lol
When the NRP disputes lies the PWC tell the CSA the NRP has to find a way of proving that the PWC is lying but the PWC is never expected to prove he/she is telling the truth… the get out clause for the CSA is to say that until Child Benefit stops, the NRP is expected to pay Child Maintenance but the CSA say that they cannot assist the NRP in doing so!!!
@ Alice (again) – in the situation above regarding the PWC lying – would it be so difficult for the CSA case worker to put payment to the PWC on hold until such times as the CSA had sufficient evidence to prove one way or the other???? This would mean that money was still being collected from the NRP but not going to the PWC until proof of the truth was provided (or returned to the NRP if the PWC was lying). CSA staff could do SO MUCH MORE for the NRP’s and PWC who NEED assistance and help but they CHOOSE
end to my post should be …
CSA staff could do SO MUCH MORE for the NRP’s and PWC’s who NEED assistance and help but they CHOOSE not to…..
Please Alice tell the CSA the system needs changing. Sally has hit the nail on the head there..Cant you do anything help us?We are at the mercy of pwc’s who are not being honest & we have to take it on the chin & pay up.The CSA are getting the credit for all they do getting money from the nrp’s.The thing is we have paid & are having to pay again because the CSA say so !!They are getting it twice from the compliant ones & the others are still getting away with it.Meanwhile it looks like the CSA are doing such a ‘fantastic’ job collecting all this money.We are going into a negative spiral but no one cares. They are on to a winner with the CH/BEN thing aren’t they…
Alice could and would not help as was a male CSA worker openly touting for business on Facebook Groups, So a CSA worker avoiding any problems an NRP had and siding and cosying up to PWC pretending to be a woman. Now what does that say about the CSA and its staff? Be very wary of anything this guy has posted as he I now believe is currently being investigated by Plymouth Business Unit where HE works. CSA ignore fraud cover it up as not their loss but should have a moral duty to protect any NRP from a fraudelent claim but as Sally says choose to ignore it. Alice has now deleted her Facebook page and left this site too. Rather than act properly CSA would rather snoop on internet groups as they now know that their actions are being recognised as fraud.